cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
ISSN : 25033697     EISSN : 25412590     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) is open-access and peer-reviewed scholarly online journal managed by Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta and published by Muhammadiyah University Press (MUP). The journal is published twice a year in January and July.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 26 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016" : 26 Documents clear
Improving Teaching Quality and Problem Solving Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning in Differential Equations: A Lesson Study Approach Khotimah, Rita Pramujiyanti; Masduki, Masduki
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1791

Abstract

Differential equations is a branch of mathematics which is closely related to mathematical modeling that arises in real-world problems. Problem solving ability is an essential component to solve contextual problem of differential equations properly. The purposes of this study are to describe contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model in differential equations course, to improve lecturers’ abilities in implementing CTL, and to improve students’ problem solving ability in differential equations. The study was conducted in the fifth semester of 2015/2016 academic year with 34 students of mathematics education Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta as participants. The CTL model was applied by lesson study approach which involved three stages namely plan, do, and see in each cycle. This research was conducted in four cycles. The study results found that discovery-based CTL could be applied in differential equations course. The lecturer abilities to design discovery-based contextual learning plan, to present real-world problem in learning process, to design learning strategy and assessment instruments of problem solving improved significantly. Problem solving ability of students also improved during teaching and learning process.
An Analysis on Eight Grade Mathematics Textbook of New Indonesian Curriculum (K-13) Based on Pisa’s Framework Sarlita Murdaningsih; Budi Murtiyasa
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1780

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and describe the mathematics problems in the eighth grade mathematics textbook of new Indonesian curriculum (K-13) based on The Programme for International Student Assesment (PISA) frameworks. The object of this study was the the revised version textbooks of the eighth grade mathematics student’s book published by The Ministry of Education and Culture (Kemendikbud) in 2014. The framework of the analysis in this study was the PISA components consisting of process, content, and context with its categories. The research method was descriptive quantitative. The data was collected by observing the contents of the textbook and interviewing the students and the teachers in SMP Negeri 2 Rembang. The analysis showed that the contents of the textbook were in accordance to the PISA components. The result also indicated that in both semester of the students’ book, the problems involving the process of employing mathematical concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning were more dominant than others. Moreover, in the contexts, the problems were dominated by the personal context. Furthermore, the first semester students’ books were dominated by the change and relationships contents while the second semester books were dominated by the space and shape contents.
The Use of Fractional Cards for Fraction Learning in The Fifth Grade Students of Elementary School Ari Indriani
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1783

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the use of fractional cards on teaching in the fifth grade students of Elementary School. The method used is descriptive qualitative. The researcher used observation, interview, and documentation to collect the data. The results showed that there was an increase on the students' enthusiasm for learning process, and there were 27 students (69.23%) that have a score above the Minimum Criteria of Mastery (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal/KKM). The study concludes that the use of fractional cards able to help the learning process on the fractions material of the fifth grade students of Elementary School.
Perbedaan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita antara Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif Mu'jizatin Fadiana
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1775

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan dua variabel yaitu kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita pokok bahasan volume kubus-balok antara siswa yang bergaya kognitif Reflektif dan siswa yang bergaya kognitif Impulsif kelas V sekolah dasar. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah 19 siswa kelas V MI Nurul Huda Ketambul Palang Tuban. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes MFF (Matching Familiar Figures) dan tes kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita. Statistik uji yang digunakan adalah Mann-Whitney. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada perbedaan kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita antara siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif dan siswa bergaya kognitif impulsif kelas V sekolah dasar.
The Profile of Students’ Thinking in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Adversity Quotient Christina Kartika Sari; Sutopo Sutopo; Dyah Ratri Aryuna
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1784

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to know the thinking processes of climber, camper, and quitter high school students in solving mathematical problems. This research used a qualitative descriptive method. Subjects were determined by purposive sampling. The technique of collecting data was done by task-based interviews. Based on the results of data analysis it can be concluded that: (1) the profiles of climber’s thinking processes are: (a) assimilation and abstraction  in understanding problems, (b) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in planning problem solving (c) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in implementing the plan of problem solving, and  (d) accommodation in checking the solution; (2) the profiles of camper’s thinking processes are: (a) assimilation in understanding mathematical problems, (b) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in planning problem solving, (c) abstraction in implementing the plan of problem solving, and (d) assimilation in checking the solution; (3) the profiles of quitter’s thinking processes are: (a) assimilation and abstraction in understanding problems, (b) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in planning problem solving, (c) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in implementing the plan of problem solving, and (d) assimilation in checking the solution.
Improving Teaching Quality and Problem Solving Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning in Differential Equations: A Lesson Study Approach Khotimah, Rita Pramujiyanti; Masduki, Masduki
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1791

Abstract

Differential equations is a branch of mathematics which is closely related to mathematical modeling that arises in real-world problems. Problem solving ability is an essential component to solve contextual problem of differential equations properly. The purposes of this study are to describe contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model in differential equations course, to improve lecturers’ abilities in implementing CTL, and to improve students’ problem solving ability in differential equations. The study was conducted in the fifth semester of 2015/2016 academic year with 34 students of mathematics education Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta as participants. The CTL model was applied by lesson study approach which involved three stages namely plan, do, and see in each cycle. This research was conducted in four cycles. The study results found that discovery-based CTL could be applied in differential equations course. The lecturer abilities to design discovery-based contextual learning plan, to present real-world problem in learning process, to design learning strategy and assessment instruments of problem solving improved significantly. Problem solving ability of students also improved during teaching and learning process.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 26

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 7 Issue 4 October 2022 Volume 7 Issue 3 July 2022 Volume 7 Issue 2 April 2022 Volume 7 Issue 1 January 2022 Volume 6 Issue 4 October 2021 Volume 6 Issue 3 July 2021 Volume 6 Issue 2 April 2021 Volume 6 Issue 1 January 2021 Volume 5 Issue 3 October 2020 Volume 5 Issue 2 June 2020 Volume 5 Issue 1 February 2020 Vol. 4, No. 2, July 2019 Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2019 Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2019: Issue In Press Vol. 3, No. 2, July 2018 Vol. 3, No. 2, July 2018: Issue In Press Vol 3, No 2 (2018) Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2018 Vol. 2, No. 2, July 2017 Vol. 2, No. 2, July 2017 Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2017 Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2017 Vol. 1, No. 2, July 2016 Vol. 1, No. 2, July 2016 Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016 Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2016 More Issue