cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sumain
Contact Email
jdh@unissula.ac.id
Phone
+6282137137002
Journal Mail Official
jdh@unissula.ac.id
Editorial Address
http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Daulat Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
ISSN : 2614560X     EISSN : 2614560X     DOI : 10.30659
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Focus and Scope The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: Criminal Law; Civil Law; International Law; Constitutional Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Economic Law; Medical Law; Adat Law; Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 553 Documents
 52   53   54   55   56 
Legal Protection for Investors in Securities Crowdfunding: A Comparative Study with Initial Public Offerings in Malaysia Dhani Supriadi; Irma Rachmawati Maruf
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/1wk9e055

Abstract

Securities crowdfunding places retail investors in a structurally different position from shareholders of listed companies because issuers face no profit-track-record requirement, securities are not exchange-traded, and no structured financial distress mechanism exists. This study examines legal protection and remedies for investors facing issuer default by comparing Indonesia’s securities crowdfunding framework with Malaysia’s initial public offering architecture. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This finding is that Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 17 of 2025 strengthens platform requirements but does not establish a structured investor exit mechanism. Malaysia distributes responsibility among gatekeepers, including the principal advisor, underwriter, and ACE Market sponsor, while Practice Note 17 and Guidance Note 3 provide distress mechanisms. Malaysia applies a tiered regulatory model relevant to Indonesian crowdfunding. Investor protection also involves financial, data, and Shariah compliance axes. Indonesia and Malaysia have strengthened data protection through Law Number 27 of 2022 and the Personal Data Protection (Amendment) Act 2024, respectively, but enforcement challenges remain. The study recommends continuing gatekeeper liability, distressed issuer classification and exit mechanisms, limits on exculpatory clauses, integrated data protection duties, and a positive-law and fiqh al-muamalat protection model.
Legal Consequences of Notarial Malpractice and Liability under Indonesian Law: A Comparative Study with European Notarial Standards Syntia Nur Anisa; Irma Rachmawati Maruf
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/pm3hr309

Abstract

Notarial malpractice raises concerns regarding legal certainty, proportionality of sanctions, and effective protection for parties affected by notarial misconduct. Indonesian positive law does not provide a normative definition of notary malpractice or classify violations according to their severity, resulting in broad discretion in the application of sanctions. This study aims to examine the construction of notary liability and the legal consequences of notarial malpractice under Indonesian law through comparison with Continental European notarial standards. A normative juridical method with a functional comparative legal approach is employed, focusing on the 2013 Deontology and Rules of Organization for Notariats of the Union Internationale du Notariat (UINL), supplemented by selected positive-law practices in Germany and France. The findings reveal that UINL standards establish thirty-nine deontological violations across three levels of severity and provide more proportionate sanctions and liability guarantees than the Indonesian framework. Indonesian law also lacks mandatory professional liability coverage and does not expressly regulate certain duties, including legal advice to vulnerable parties and verification of rights. The study contributes six reform proposals addressing severity classification, sanction limits, monetary fines, professional insurance, verification duties, and revision of Article 84 of the Law on the Office of Notary.
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Legislation Perspectives from Economic Analysis of Law and Constitutionality Zuleka Rohmah Yantika; Radit Fabian
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/56h7kx27

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into legislative processes offers opportunities to improve information management and drafting efficiency, but raises questions about constitutional legitimacy and economic feasibility. This study aims to examines the legal boundaries and efficiency conditions governing AI use in Indonesian law formation and develops an AI-Assisted Legislative Process model. Using normative juridical methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, it analyzes constitutional provisions, legislation, and the institutional context of the AKSI platform and Data Sharing Portal developed by the Expertise Body of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. The findings indicate that AI cannot replace constitutionally authorized law-making institutions under Articles 20 and 22D of the 1945 Constitution and must remain a human-controlled decision-support tool. From an Economic Analysis of Law perspective, AI adoption is efficient only when information-cost savings exceed transaction, verification, error, and social costs, consistent with the Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion. Accordingly, the study proposes a nine-stage AI-Assisted Legislative Process model incorporating two control mechanisms: an EAL Cost-Benefit Gate and a Constitutional Legitimacy Check. The study proposes an integrated framework for evaluating AI-assisted legislation and recommends human-centered safeguards and binding regulations for AI use in legislative processes.

Page 56 of 56 | Total Record : 553

 52   53   54   55   56 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): September 2026 Vol 9, No 3 (2026): September 2026 Vol 9, No 2 (2026): June 2026 Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026 Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025 Vol 8, No 3 (2025): September 2025 Vol 8, No 2 (2025): June 2025 Vol 8, No 1 (2025): March 2025 Vol 7, No 4 (2024): December 2024 Vol 7, No 3 (2024): September 2024 Vol 7, No 2 (2024): June 2024 Vol 7, No 1 (2024): March 2024 Vol 6, No 4 (2023): December 2023 Vol 6, No 3 (2023): September 2023 Vol 6, No 2 (2023): June 2023 Vol 6, No 1 (2023): March 2023 Vol 5, No 4 (2022): December 2022 Vol 5, No 3 (2022): September 2022 Vol 5, No 2 (2022): June 2022 Vol 5, No 1 (2022): March 2022 Vol 4, No 4 (2021): December 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): June 2021 Vol 4, No 1 (2021): March 2021 Vol 4, No 3 (2021): September Vol 3, No 4 (2020): December 2020 Vol 3, No 3 (2020): September 2020 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): June 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2020): March 2020 Vol 2, No 4 (2019): December 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): September 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): June 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): March 2019 Vol 1, No 4 (2018): December 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): September 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): June 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018) More Issue