Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Widiya Yul
Magister Hukum Keluarga Islam, IAIN Kerinci, Indonesia
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Itsbat Nikah dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam ( KHI): Studi Perbandingan Putusan No. 87/Pdt.P/2025/Pa Spn dan No. 165/Pdt.P/2025/Pa Spn di Pengadilan Agama Sungai Penuh Erivan Angga Utama; Widiya Yul
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v8i4.11617

Abstract

This study is entitled “Itsbat Nikah in the Perspective of the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI): A Comparative Study of Decision No. 87/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Spn and No. 165/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Spn at the Sungai Penuh Religious Court.” The research aims to analyze and compare the judges’ legal reasoning in two itsbat nikah cases that resulted in different decisions, as well as to evaluate the application of legal norms from the perspective of the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The research employs a normative–juridical approach (doctrinal legal research) combined with comparative and qualitative methods. The normative approach is used to examine written legal norms, such as Law No. 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law No. 16 of 2019 and the KHI, as well as their implementation in the practice of religious courts. The comparative approach identifies similarities, differences, and patterns of judicial interpretation between the two decisions, while the qualitative approach interprets the meaning behind the judges’ legal considerations in a descriptive and interpretative manner. The findings indicate that the judges of the Sungai Penuh Religious Court applied the principle of harmonization between Islamic law and Indonesian positive law in assessing the validity of unregistered marriages. Decision No. 87/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Spn reflects an administrative-sociological approach, emphasizing the principle of maslahah and the community’s administrative needs to obtain legal certainty for religiously valid marriages. In contrast, Decision No. 165/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Spn demonstrates a normative-restrictive approach, rejecting the itsbat nikah petition due to a violation of the minimum marriage age as stipulated in Article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 16 of 2019. This difference shows that itsbat nikah is not merely a mechanism for legalizing unregistered marriages, but a judicial instrument to uphold legal certainty in line with justice, public benefit, and human rights protection. Accordingly, this study underscores the importance of synergy between religious law and state law in developing a fair, adaptive, and socially protective marriage legal system.
Kedudukan Sumpah Suppletoir Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perceraian: Analisis Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Joni Iswandi; Widiya Yul
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i2.7797

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan Sumpah Suppletoir sebagai alat bukti dalam perkara perceraian serta meninjau kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip-prinsip pembuktian dalam Hukum Islam. Sumpah Suppletoir, sebagai sumpah pelengkap yang diberikan kepada salah satu pihak ketika alat bukti lain dinilai belum memadai, memiliki peran signifikan dalam penyelesaian sengketa perceraian, terutama ketika terjadi kekurangan bukti atau ketidakjelasan fakta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan hukum normatif-empiris, melalui studi terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur fikih, dan analisis putusan Pengadilan Agama Sungai Penuh yang menerapkan Sumpah Suppletoir dalam proses pembuktian. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif, Sumpah Suppletoir memiliki legitimasi dalam hukum positif Indonesia dan memiliki kesesuaian dengan konsep sumpah (al-yamin) dalam fikih, terutama sebagai instrumen untuk menguatkan kebenaran pihak yang lemah dalam pembuktian. Namun demikian, secara praktis penerapannya masih menimbulkan perdebatan terkait aspek keadilan, potensi penyalahgunaan, serta perlindungan terhadap pihak yang rentan, khususnya perempuan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kedudukan Sumpah Suppletoir tetap relevan sebagai alat bukti, tetapi perlu diharmoniskan dengan prinsip kehati-hatian, keadilan prosedural, dan nilai-nilai maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah agar tidak menyimpang dari tujuan penegakan hukum yang adil dan berintegritas.
Co-Authors Erivan Angga Utama Joni Iswandi