Navi’ Vadila
Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Dynamics of Islamic Law in the Practice of Modern Religious Philanthropy Rohmawati Rohmawati; Muhammad Zulfan Abdusyakur; Ghazy Ahmad Filando; Navi’ Vadila
Insani: Jurnal Pranata Sosial Hukum Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Insani: Jurnal Pranata Sosial Hukum Islam
Publisher : Mahkota Science Publishers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65586/insani.v1i2.41

Abstract

In the vortex of digital modernity that has shifted Islamic philanthropy from communal worship to a global institutional instrument, the dynamics of Islamic law appear not as a frozen normative legacy, but as a philosophical arena where authority, social justice, and the meaning of piety are renegotiated amid the tug-of-war between text, maqāṣid, state, and market logic. This study aims to formulate conceptual and practical contributions to the development of Islamic philanthropy that is responsive to changing times while remaining grounded in sharia principles. It employs a qualitative approach with a multiple-case study design grounded in doctrinal analysis, seeking to map the dynamics of Islamic law in modern philanthropy through documented texts and practices. The results indicate that modern Islamic philanthropy can no longer be understood merely as the technical application of fiqh ʿibādah māliyyah, but has transformed into a strategic arena in which Islamic law is produced, contested, and fought over within power relations among scholars, the state, the market, and digital technology. This dynamic shows that philanthropic innovation is not only a matter of legal permissibility, but also of the direction of social justice one wishes to realise. The validity of innovation is not determined solely by textual conformity, but also by governance, transparency, platform design, and beneficiaries' experiences in interpreting justice and trust.
REINTERPRETING QUR’AN 4:32 THROUGH MA’NA-CUM-MAGHZA: A Hermeneutical Framework for Gender Justice Akhmad Aidil Fitra; Siti Nuri Nurhaidah; Muhammad Haris Hakam; Mudrikatul Arafah; Navi’ Vadila
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Ushuluddin and Religious Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v24i2.5228

Abstract

This study aims to reinterpret Q. 4:32 through the perspective of Ma'na-cum-Maghza hermeneutics to assess its relevance in the contemporary discourse on gender justice. This effort aims to overcome patriarchal readings in classical interpretations by reconstructing the historical meaning of the verse and exploring its normative significance for the current socio-religious context. This study uses a text-based qualitative approach through in-depth reading and hermeneutic analysis, comparing classical, medieval and modern interpretations, and integrating Muslim feminist perspectives. The results of the analysis show that Q. 4:32 affirms the agency of both men and women and rejects hierarchical interpretations detrimental to women. The emphasis on divine grace represents broader distributive justice and supports egalitarian principles in gender relations. Through the Ma'na-cum-Maghza framework, this study concludes that Q. 4:32 provides a normative basis for equal pay, recognition of women's roles in domestic and public spaces, and family law reform based on justice and reciprocity. The novelty of this study lies in the application of Ma'na-cum-Maghza as a uniquely Indonesian hermeneutical framework that bridges the historical context with contemporary ethical demands, while strengthening the theological legitimacy for social and legal reform in Muslim societies.