Yudha Adhipratama
Universitas Suryakancana

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Bentuk Antara Negara Federal, Negara Konfederasi, dan Negara Kesatuan dalam Prespektif Ilmu Negara Dedi Mulyadi; Ira Putri Rahmasari; Zahra Mauliyah; Yudha Adhipratama; Asnita Anuar
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i2.38

Abstract

This article discusses a comparison between the forms of federal states, confederations, and unitary states from the perspective of the science of the state. The background of the study highlights the importance of understanding the differences in these governmental structures, as each form has a distinct system of power distribution. The research questions raised include the characteristics of each state form, differences in power distribution, and their impacts on governance and regional autonomy. The research method used is a literature study by analyzing theories in the science of the state and examining examples of countries that apply each form of government. The conclusion shows that federal states divide power between the central and regional governments, confederations emphasize the sovereignty of member states, while unitary states centralize power in the central government. Each system has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the social, political, and cultural context of the respective country. This study also found that the choice of state form can influence political stability, resource management, and the relationship between the central and regional governments. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of these governmental systems is essential in designing effective policies in a country.
Peranan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjaga Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia Alika Hania Auliya; Dedi Mulyadi; Fawazi Rihadatulaisy Mulyadi; Mustika Hidayat; Yasmin Khairunisa; Yudha Adhipratama
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v3i3.5734

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of the Constitutional Court’s procedural law in upholding constitutionalism in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach through a literature review, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The data was analyzed systematically to understand the authority, functions, and practices of the Constitutional Court within the constitutional system. The results of the study indicate that the Constitutional Court plays a strategic role as a guardian of the constitution through its authority to review laws against the 1945 Constitution, resolve disputes over the authority of state institutions, dissolve political parties, and address disputes regarding election results. The Constitutional Court’s procedural law serves as a crucial guideline to ensure that the review process and decision-making proceed effectively, transparently, and fairly. Additionally, the Constitutional Court plays a role in the impeachment mechanism as a balancing force between legal and political aspects. However, challenges exist in the form of unclear boundaries between legal and political considerations, as well as inconsistencies in the interpretation of legal standing and constitutional harm. This necessitates the strengthening of judicial standards and the consistency of rulings to maintain the institution’s legitimacy and reinforce the supremacy of the constitution and democracy.