Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Law Development Journal Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan
Grace Juanita
Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pemanfaatan Kecerdasan Artifisial (Artificial Intelligence/AI) Dalam Kerangka Pancasila Grace Juanita
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.5.2.10622.1141-1151

Abstract

The development and advancement of technology, especially the Industrial Revolution 4.0, introduced humans to artificial intelligence (AI). AI plays a role in changing human lifestyles. There are logical and fair characters and use considerations of justice and human values, according to the Pancasila framework. This study presents the issue of whether Pancasila values are beneficial for the utilization of artificial intelligence. How is artificial intelligence utilized within the Pancasila framework? According to the issue studied, it answers that artificial intelligence, which continues to develop rapidly, has not been able to be in the corridor of its main objectives, namely the protection of human rights and respect for human dignity in the digital era. Even though the values of Pancasila are taught and grounded in the social environment, human behavior has not changed according to the targeted goals. Often the development model of artificial intelligence does not always adhere to ethical values, especially in areas that are closely related to efforts to replace the role of humans, who are vulnerable to eliminating respect for the nobility of human dignity.
A Review of Social Media Restrictions for Children in Indonesia Grace Juanita; Tristam Pascal Moeliono; Lidwina Larasati Himawan; Vionna Angeline Chandra
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v6i2.3861

Abstract

The growing use of social media platforms by adolescents presents serious challenges such as cyberbullying, data exploitation and adverse psychological effects. Hence, strong regulatory frameworks are essential. This research aims to analyze the legal framework on the limitation of social media for minors in Indonesia and to compare it with the practices in the United States of America and Australia. The research is developed from the standpoint of legislation and comparative law, the normative juridical technique. The main legal tools are Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 (Indonesia), Arkansas Act 689 (United States), the Online Safety Amendment Act 2024 (Australia) and relevant international human rights treaties. Secondary sources are scholarly publications , journal articles , government papers etc . The data were acquired by document review and evaluated using qualitative technique with descriptive analysis. Data veracity was assured by source triangulation and rigorous legal interpretation. “It exposes a huge split in how regulators. The United States ruled that Arkansas Act 689 was unconstitutional because it violated the strong First Amendment right to free expression. Australia has taken a tough prohibitionist stance with large financial penalties for platforms that do not comply. Mental health and safety of children are the top priority Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 of the Indonesian Government has implemented the age categorisation and risk-based access plan that requires parental authorisation and imposes considerable cost on electronic system providers. Like any administrative statute, it has its own challenges, including low levels of digital literacy, uneven technology infrastructure across the archipelago, pushback from global platforms and the absence of an independent supervision body and comprehensive means for victim compensation. The research says more collaboration across sectors, a stronger regulatory framework and higher levels of digital literacy are needed to create a truly safe digital ecosystem for children.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Development of the Legal Profession Grace Juanita; Budi Prastowo
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.1073-1089

Abstract

Amidst rapid technological advancement, this study investigates the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on human relationships and the safeguarding of human dignity. The research questions whether AI’s current trajectory aligns with ethical standards and preserves the core values of human interaction. This study aims to analyze the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) development and utilization on changing patterns of human relationships and to assess its implications for the protection of human dignity. Using a normative juridical approach combined with interdisciplinary analysis from ethics and philosophy, the study critically assesses both the advantages, and the ethical risks associated with AI integration. It explores how AI reshapes traditional social dynamics and tests existing legal-ethical frameworks. Through a review of selected case studies and theoretical discourse, the paper identifies deficiencies in existing regulations and emphasizes the urgent need for comprehensive ethical and legal standards. The findings highlight the importance of redefining ethical practices within legal frameworks to ensure justice, transparency, and the continuous protection of human dignity amid evolving AI technologies. The study concludes that AI should function as a supportive tool for legal professionals rather than a substitute for human judgment, with its development and utilization.
Co-Authors Budi Prastowo Lidwina Larasati Himawan Tristam Pascal Moeliono Vionna Angeline Chandra