Muzaqky Muthahhari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Abu Zayd's Interpretation of the Story of the Prophet Moses: Reading the Prophet's Humanity in a Contextual Hermeneutic Frame Muzaqky Muthahhari; Khairunnas Jamal; Mochammad Novendri S
ALSYS Vol 6 No 1 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/alsys.v6i1.8604

Abstract

This study investigates Nasr Ḥāmid Abu Zayd’s interpretation of the Qur’anic story of Prophet Moses through the framework of contextual hermeneutics, against the background of traditional Qur’anic exegesis that predominantly emphasizes the miraculous and transcendental aspects of prophethood and tends to portray prophets as infallible and distant figures. The study aims to analyze how Abu Zayd challenges this paradigm by reinterpreting revelation as a historical discourse shaped by human language, socio-political context, and lived struggle. Employing a qualitative textual analysis, the research examines Abu Zayd’s primary works—Mafhūm al-Naṣṣ (The Concept of Text) and Naqd al-Khiṭāb al-Dīnī (Critique of Religious Discourse)—alongside contemporary academic discussions on humanistic and contextual hermeneutics. The findings show that Abu Zayd depicts Moses not as a mythical hero but as a profoundly human figure who fears, doubts, errs, and grows (Qur’ān 28:15–16), thereby foregrounding prophetic experience as ethically charged human struggle rather than static perfection. Through this lens, the Qur’ān emerges as a living dialogue between the divine and the human that continually generates meaning through historical interaction. The study concludes that Abu Zayd’s hermeneutics redefines prophethood in terms of ethical humanity instead of unattainable divine impeccability and offers a liberating, contextually relevant interpretive model for modern Islamic thought, particularly for rethinking asbāb al-nuzūl, contextual tafsīr, and contemporary engagements with prophetic narratives.
Disaster, Memory, and Maqāṣid: Rereading the Pharaoh Story in the Context of the Tragedy of Sumatera Muzaqky Muthahhari; Lukmanul Hakim
ALSYS Vol 6 No 4 (2026): JULI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/alsys.v6i4.11394

Abstract

The flash floods and landslides in Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra demonstrate that hydrometeorological disasters are not solely natural phenomena but also cumulative consequences of upstream ecological degradation, including deforestation and peatland damage, compounded by governance failures. This study aims to analyze these disasters through a maqāṣidī interpretation of the Qur’anic story of Pharaoh to reveal the normative and political dimensions of leadership negligence. Employing a qualitative literature-based method, the study conducted hermeneutic analysis, thematic identification, and synthesis of primary and secondary sources concerning Qur’anic narratives, ecological conditions, and disaster policies. The findings reveal three principal points. First, “Pharaohistic” patterns of leadership, characterized by absolutism, the normalization of structural violence, and narrative manipulation, are reflected in political decisions that disregard public safety. Second, delays in declaring national disaster status aggravated emergency response and contributed to secondary fatalities by constraining the mobilization of resources and essential services. Third, effective disaster prevention and recovery require the integration of evidence-based ecological interventions, including upstream ecosystem restoration, a moratorium on land conversion, and peatland management, with policy reform, institutional accountability, and local community participation. The study concludes that disaster mitigation and reconstruction should be situated within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, particularly ḥifẓ al-nafs, as a normative benchmark for governmental legitimacy and responsibility. Without structural ecological and governance reforms, similar disasters are likely to recur. These findings contribute to ecological Islamic studies by connecting Qur’anic narratives of oppressive leadership with contemporary disaster governance and imply the need for risk-based emergency declarations, upstream ecosystem rehabilitation, and transparent accountability mechanisms.