This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati
Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar-Bali, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Terkait Titik Singgung Antara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Peradilan Umum Dalam Sengketa Pertanahan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 27/G/2017/Ptun.Dps) I Gede Aris Eka Pramana; I Made Arjaya; Ida Ayu Putu Widiati
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.77-81

Abstract

Indonesia's natural resources are very useful to meet the needs of their people, one of the most important needs is land. But land often causes disputes among the people, a fair settlement, in accordance with the applicable administration is highly expected. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court and General Courts related to the tangent point in land disputes and how to consider the Denpasar State Administrative Court Judges in dropping the Decision regarding the tangency point of authority of the State Administrative Court and District Court case study No. verdict 27 / G / 2017 / PTUN.DPS. This study uses normative legal research, StatuteApproach, Conceptual Approach and case approach. The State Administrative Court and the General Court (Civil) have competencies that intersect in land disputes. To certify land that has something to do with customary land in Bali as well as village land (AYDS), it is regulated at the Provincial Government of Bali number: 3 of 2011 concerning Pakramman village. Which in order to be able to certify a land of Ayahan Desa (AYDS) that the community wants to ask for has not been permitted, this is done so that Adat and Balinese culture remain steady and sustainable. The customary land in Bali is inseparable from the obligation to pay for or give services to the village, therefore for village karma it is prohibited to trade and buy it. Sumber daya alam Indonesia sangat bermanfaat untuk memenuhi kebutuhan hidup masyarakatnya salah satu kebutuhan yang sangat penting adalah tanah. Namun tanah sering menimbulkan sengketa di kalangan masyarakat, penyelesaian yang adil, sesuai dengan administrasi yang berlaku sangat diharapkan. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini bagaimana kompetensi absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Peradilan Umum terkait titik singgung dalam sengketa pertanahan dan Bagaimana pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Denpasar dalam menjatuhkan Putusan terkait titik singgung kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Pengadilan Negeri studi kasus putusan nomor 27/G/2017/PTUN.DPS. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, pendekatan Per Undang-Undangan, Pendekatan Konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Pengadilan Umum (Perdata) mempunyai kompetensi yang bersinggungan dalam sengketa pertanahan. Untuk mensertifikatkan tanah yang ada kaitannya dengan tanah adat di Bali seperti halnya tanah ayahan desa (AYDS) di atur pada Perda Prov bali nomor: 3 Tahun 2011 tentang desa pakraman dimana untuk dapat mensertifikatkan suatu tanah Ayahan Desa (AYDS) yang ingin dimohonkan oleh masyarakat sebelum di perijinkan maka dalam hal ini dilakukan supaya Adat dan budaya Bali tetap ajeg dan lestari. Tanah adat yang ada di bali tak terlepas dari kewajiban-kewajiban untuk ngayah atau memberi ayahan kepada desa, oleh karena itu bagi krama desa dilarang untuk memperjual belikannya.
Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Lisensi Terhadap Pihak Ketiga I Kadek Bayu Surya Diana; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Ida Ayu Putu Widiati
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.2.2019.202-206

Abstract

The licensing agreement means an agreement that functions as a group to regulate the legal ties between licensors and licensees. The license agreement must be registered by the minister in the general list of Copyright License agreements. However, what is a problem is whether the license agreement made by a special group is able to bind a third party if the copyright has not been registered based on the arrangement of procedures for recording the license agreement. Based on this, other problems arose in this research, namely (1) How to regulate procedures for registration of broadcasting license agreements, and (2) What are the legal consequences of licensing agreements with third parties. Based on this, there is a vacuum of norms found in Article 83 paragraph (4) of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright; based on this matter the author examines this research using normative methods. In writing the author uses the method of legislative approach and legal concept analysis approach. In the source of legal material in this study on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Finally the legal material collection technique uses a card system. Legal material analysis techniques used are descriptive techniques, interpretive techniques, evaluative techniques, systemic techniques and argumentative techniques. In a licensing agreement there is a legal consequence of a licensing agreement with a third party where one of the parties violates or defaults where the licensing agreement is not recorded at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights which only binds the parties to the agreement, namely the licensor and the licensee. A result that can occur from the existence of bad faith, or default by the parties, the agreement can be canceled or null and void by law. The legal settlement efforts in the misappropriation of this licensing agreement can be done by non-Litigation and litigation.
Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Harta Bersama Akibat Perceraian Ni Kadek Ani; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Ida Ayu Putu Widiati
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.17-21

Abstract

In living a household life, it is often that problems arise that cause disputes and end up with divorce between couples. The breakup of marriage will cause problems, one of which is the family's wealth. Marriage agreements are made to anticipate possible problems that occur in a marriage. The problem statement from this study is: (1) how is the arrangement of the Marriage Law in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage? (2) How is the legal protection of common property after the verdict of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in the event of a divorce? This study is a type of normative law research, since its assessment is carried out through a library study. The Regulation of Marriage Agreements in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, contained in Chapter V, Article 29. The Marriage Agreement was made before the marriage was held and valid since the marriage took place. After the verdict of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, the Marriage Agreement can be made after the marriage between the husband and wife takes place and must be recorded. This marriage agreement binds the husband, wife, and third party. Marriage agreements provide law protection for both husband and wife to their property if they have to divorce for a reason.