This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Desak Made Setyarini; Ni Luh Mahendrawati; Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.12-16

Abstract

Abstract-Directors in a limited liability company can be likened to a life for the company. The Board of Directors in carrying out their duties in managing a limited liability company has the possibility to carry out acts against the law both civil and criminal in nature. However, acts against the law can be directly carried out by the company through its organs, or vice versa, acts against the law are carried out by employees and the company is responsible. Based on this, the problem is obtained: 1) what forms of unlawful actions by the Board of Directors in managing a limited liability company (Corporation)? 2) What is the responsibility of the Directors who commit illegal acts? This research method uses normative legal research, with literature studies of primary and secondary legal materials. Based on research findings, it is known that: 1) Forms of unlawful acts carried out by directors: using company money/ wealth for personal gain, company information for personal gain, conducting related parties transactions with companies, prohibiting competition with the company 2) Directors' responsibility for illegal acts is regulated in Law No. 40 of 2007 the directors are responsible for managing the company where the management has to be done by each member of the board of directors, in good faith and full of responsibility. From this, it is necessary to optimize the implementation and supervision of the Corporation Law which substantially provides protection to business stakeholder and other public rights. Keyword: Accountability of Directors, Limited Liability Companies, Action against the Law Abstrak-Direksi di dalam perseroan terbatas dapat diumpamakan sebagai nyawa bagi perseroan. Direksi dalam menjalankan tugasnya mengelola perseroan terbatas memiliki kemungkinan untuk melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum baik bersifat perdata maupun pidana. Akan tetapi, perbuatan melawan hukum itu dapat langsung dilakukan oleh perusahaan melalui organ-organnya, atau sebaliknya perbuatan melawan hukum itu dilakukan oleh pegawai dan perusahaan wajib mempertanggungjawabkan. Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka didapatlah permasalahan yakni 1) Bagaimana bentuk perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Direksi di dalam mengurus perseroan terbatas? 2) Bagaimana tanggung jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum? Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan studi kepustakaan dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian diketahui bahwa: 1) Bentuk perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh direksi: mempergunakan uang/ kekayaan perseroan untuk kepentingan pribadi, informasi perseroan untuk kepentingan pribadi, melakukan transaksi dengan perseroan, larangan bersaing dengan perseroan 2) Pertanggungjawaban direksi atas perbuatan melawan hukum diatur dalam UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 direksi bertanggung jawab atas pengurusan perseroan dimana pengurusan itu wajib dilaksanakan setiap anggota direksi dengan itikad baik dan penuh tanggung jawab. Dari hal tersebut sebaiknya Perlu optimalisasi pelaksanaan dan pengawasan UUPT yang secara substansial memberikan perlindungan kepada pelaku bisnis dan hak-hak publik lainnya. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban Direksi, Perseroan Terbatas, Melawan Hukum
Tanggungjawab Dokter Terhadap Pasien dalam Perjanjian Terapeutik Komang Ayu Windy Widyastari Putri; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.2.3.2020.315-319

Abstract

Abstract—Humans are living being who have the right to get a good and healthy environment and are entitled to health services. According to article number 36, 2009 about Health, Therapeutic Agreement which is the relationship between doctor and the patient that allow doctor to conduct giving healthcare to the patients according their skills. The background of this paper is because there is an agreement of therapeutic between doctor and patient. The problem rise: 1. what is the law regulation of Therapeutic agreement between doctor and the patient in medical services? 2. How is the civil law and criminal law responsibility between doctor and the patient in therapeutic agreement? This paper is also intended to know about doctor’s responsibility to the patient of therapeutic agreement. Normatic law scientific method is used in writing this paper with statute approach, conceptual approach, and document approach. The source of law study primary secondary, secondary and tarsiers. The conclusion is the terapeutik agreement between doctor and patient is listed under the article of doctor’s responsibility of therapeutical agreement in general can be divided into 3, (1) the act of law violation (Article 1365 Civil Code); (2) irresponsible or careless act (Article 1366 Civil Code); (3) The Responsibility of the Leader to their Ordinate (Article 1367 Civil Code). And added with number.36 Act of 2009 on health, article 56 paragraphs 1, 2, 3, article 57 paragraph 1, 2, article 58 paragraphs 1, 2, 3.
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 15 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat Darurat Covid-19 di Dinas Perhubungan, Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Jembrana Ni Komang Sutha Yudiansari; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.4.2.2022.162-166

Abstract

Jembrana is a district located at the West end of the island of Bali. The job of the Transportation Office is to conduct transportation or transportation policies in Jembrana Regency. Soaring cases of the Covid-19 pandemic led the government to issue the Ministry of Home Affairs regulation No. 15 of 2021 so it is mandatory to implement restrictions on people's activities. The formulation of the problem discussed is: What is the effectiveness of the implementation of Ordinance No. 15 of 2021 on Enforcement of Restrictions on Covid-19 Emergency Community Activities at Jembrana District Transportation, Oceans and Fisheries Office? And How is the government's policy on regulating land travel transportation during the period of the enforcement of the Covid-19 Emergency Community Activity Restriction in Jembrana District Transportation, Oceans and Fisheries Office. This research method uses empirical research types. The effectiveness of implementing the Enforcement of Restrictions on Community Activities has been in accordance with the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation No. 15 of 2021 that applies to the Transportation Office and Jembrana Regency areas. The government's policy of regulating land-travel transportation is to initialize passengers and compulsory PCR tests and vaccinations.