This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Ni Kadek Ayu Dwiyanti
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Putusan Terhadap Eksepsi Kewenangan Relatif Dalam Mengadili Perkara Perzinahan (Studi Kasus Putusan Sela Nomor: 14/Pid.B/2023/PN Bli) Ni Kadek Ayu Dwiyanti; I Made Minggu Widyantara; Kade Richa Mulyawati
Jurnal Analogi Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jah.7.1.2025.71-76

Abstract

Exception is a form of objection or legal action that can lead to an interlocutory decision taken by a judge, usually in response to a challenge regarding his authority to adjudicate in court. The problem is 1) how the basis for determining relative authority in the decision of an adultery case is a case study of interlocutory decision Number 14/Pid.B/2023/PN Bli? and 2) how the ratio legis of the judge related to the authority to adjudicate in interlocutory decision Number 14/Pid.B/2023/PN Bli?. The purpose is to know and describe the basis for determining relative authority in the decision of an adultery case case study and the suitability of the judge's ratio legis related to the authority to adjudicate in Interlocutory Decision Number 14/Pid.B/2023/PN Bli. The method used is the normative law method. The relative authority to handle cases between two courts is determined by Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP), specifically articles 148 and 84. The judge's understanding of the interlocutory decision was that the Bangli District Court acknowledged the objection of the legal counsel stating that it did not have the authority of the case.