Ekki Suryana Zaen
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ADAPTASI MODEL SOLIDARITAS PEMIKIRAN SYEIKH AHMAD YASSIN UNTUK PENGUATAN SOLIDARITAS KEINDONESIAAN: (Adaptation of Sheikh Ahmad Yassin's Solidarity Model to Strengthen Indonesian Solidarity) Ekki Suryana Zaen; Muhammad Fahmy bin Rapaee; Muhammad Firdaus
Raqib: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Perspektif Islam Terhadap Modernitas
Publisher : Ikatan Sarjana Al-Qur'an Indonesia (ISQI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56872/e6x2ns98

Abstract

Religiously-informed social leadership plays a crucial role in strengthening community solidarity, particularly amid identity crises, conflicts, or structural development challenges. This research analyzes the architecture of solidarity built by Sheikh Ahmad Yassin (1937-2004), the founder of Hamas, in Palestine, and adapts his conceptual strategies into the framework of Indonesian nationhood (Konsep Keindonesiaan). Although studies on Yassin often focus on the political and military dimensions of resistance, this analysis posits that his success lies in a unique and multidimensional strategy: the institutionalization of solidarity, which strategically filled humanitarian and social vacuums through the establishment of educational, welfare, and health institutions. Using a functional comparative and hermeneutic approach, key findings indicate that the pillars of Yassin’s movement, namely (1) moral leadership derived from physical weakness, (2) the institutionalization of social services as a political pre-condition, and (3) a multidimensional struggle ideology integrating spiritual and material aspects, hold significant functional relevance for the role of Islamic social organizations (Ormas Islam) in Indonesia. This conceptual adaptation transforms Yassin’s concept of Jihad of Resistance (against occupation and maintaining land as waqaf) into Jihad of Development within the Indonesian Context. Jihad of Development is understood as a collective, structured, and continuous effort by Ormas Islam to overcome the nation’s structural weaknesses (such as stunting and poverty), thereby strengthening social resilience and consolidating Indonesian religious nationalism based on the universal principle of kemaslahatan (public benefit).
Genealogy of Thought of Islamic Da'wah Organizations in Indonesia: A Historical Analysis of NU, Muhammadiyah, Persis, and Al-Washliyah Ummi Sa'adah; Ekki Suryana Zaen; Muhammad Firdaus; M Yakub
AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 3: Mei-Juni 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Jami Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69900/ag.v6i3.623

Abstract

This article examines the genealogy of thought of four major Islamic da'wah institutions in Indonesia, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah, Persatuan Islam (Persis), and Al-Jam'iyatul Washliyah (Al-Washliyah). Employing a historical-comparative approach with genealogical analysis inspired by Michel Foucault's framework, this study traces the historical roots, ideological foundations, da'wah character, and intellectual dynamics of each institution within the context of modern Indonesia. Data were gathered through primary and secondary academic literature from leading scholars in the field of Indonesian Islamic history. The findings reveal that although all four institutions emerged from relatively similar socio-historical pressures namely Dutch colonialism and the global wave of Islamic modernism, each developed a distinctive da'wah character. NU embraced a cultural-traditionalist approach rooted in the pesantren tradition and the Ahlussunnah wal Jamaah creed, Muhammadiyah championed dakwah bil-hal (action-based preaching) and social reformism through modern education and charitable enterprises, Persis emphasized textual-puritan argumentation by rejecting taqlid and bid'ah, while Al-Washliyah integrated da'wah with education within a wasathiyyah (moderate) framework. These differing orientations can be traced to divergent intellectual genealogies, Muhammadiyah and Persis absorbed reformist thought from the Middle East (al-Afghani, Abduh, Ridha), while NU and Al-Washliyah remained more deeply rooted in the classical Islamic scholarly tradition of the Malay-Nusantara world. This diversity of orientation represents not a contradiction but rather the intellectual richness of Indonesian Islam, a complementary plurality capable of addressing contemporary challenges including digitalization and religious radicalism
Genealogy of Thought of Islamic Da'wah Organizations in Indonesia: A Historical Analysis of NU, Muhammadiyah, Persis, and Al-Washliyah Ummi Sa'adah; Ekki Suryana Zaen; Muhammad Firdaus; M Yakub
AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 3: Mei-Juni 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Jami Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69900/ag.v6i3.623

Abstract

This article examines the genealogy of thought of four major Islamic da'wah institutions in Indonesia, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah, Persatuan Islam (Persis), and Al-Jam'iyatul Washliyah (Al-Washliyah). Employing a historical-comparative approach with genealogical analysis inspired by Michel Foucault's framework, this study traces the historical roots, ideological foundations, da'wah character, and intellectual dynamics of each institution within the context of modern Indonesia. Data were gathered through primary and secondary academic literature from leading scholars in the field of Indonesian Islamic history. The findings reveal that although all four institutions emerged from relatively similar socio-historical pressures namely Dutch colonialism and the global wave of Islamic modernism, each developed a distinctive da'wah character. NU embraced a cultural-traditionalist approach rooted in the pesantren tradition and the Ahlussunnah wal Jamaah creed, Muhammadiyah championed dakwah bil-hal (action-based preaching) and social reformism through modern education and charitable enterprises, Persis emphasized textual-puritan argumentation by rejecting taqlid and bid'ah, while Al-Washliyah integrated da'wah with education within a wasathiyyah (moderate) framework. These differing orientations can be traced to divergent intellectual genealogies, Muhammadiyah and Persis absorbed reformist thought from the Middle East (al-Afghani, Abduh, Ridha), while NU and Al-Washliyah remained more deeply rooted in the classical Islamic scholarly tradition of the Malay-Nusantara world. This diversity of orientation represents not a contradiction but rather the intellectual richness of Indonesian Islam, a complementary plurality capable of addressing contemporary challenges including digitalization and religious radicalism