Willy Naresta Hanum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of The Commission for The Acceleration of Police Reform in Integrating Legal Politics with The Reconstruction of The Constitutional and Legislative Systems Rengga Kusuma Putra; Lita Tyesta Addy Listya Wardhani; Bagus Hermanto; Willy Naresta Hanum; Aziz Widhi Nugroho
PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): Volume 12, Number 2 April-June 2026
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v12i2.87

Abstract

The institutional reform of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) is a strategic agenda in realizing democratic and just governance. One of the main challenges is the integration of legal politics and the reconstruction of the constitutional system and legislation consistent with national legal principles. This study aims to analyze the role of the Commission for the Acceleration of Indonesian National Police Reform in integrating legal politics with the reconstruction of the constitutional system and legislation, identify supporting and inhibiting factors in the integration process, and evaluate its impact on the effectiveness of Polri institutional reform. The research method used is qualitative with a normative-sociological legal approach, involving legal document analysis, literature studies, semi-structured interviews, and participant observation. The results show that the Commission successfully bridged inter-institutional coordination, regulatory harmonization, and the implementation of institutional practices aligned with the principles of legal politics, thereby increasing the effectiveness of reform. Supporting factors include political support and internal awareness of the Polri, while obstacles arise from overlapping regulations, internal resistance, and limited resources. This study makes a scientific contribution by emphasizing the importance of integration between legal norms and the socio-institutional context for sustainable institutional reform. Keywords: Commission for the Acceleration of Police Reform; Legal Politics; State Reconstruction.
Criminal Liability for Corruption of Bribery: Problems and Legal Reform Rian Saputra; M Zaid; Muhammad Kurniawan Budi Wibowo; Willy Naresta Hanum; Devi Triasari
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.22251

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the concerns of bribery and corruption within Indonesia’s legal framework for combating corruption, particularly with the duality in establishing legal norms that support criminal liability for bribery offenses. After identifying the concerns, this study aims to suggest ideas for amending bribery and corruption legislation based on legal certainty. This normative legal examination utilizes a legislative methodology and a comparative law framework. The study’s findings reveal that the Corruption Eradication Law, which regulates bribery offenses, engenders legal ambiguity in enforcing such crimes, as the legislators, namely the government and the Indonesian Parliament, have instituted provisions for bribery offenses that lack consistency. The manifestation of this phenomenon is mainly determined by the subjective assessments of law enforcement officials concerning the relevant statute. The subjective discretion of law enforcement officials in choosing relevant statutes may lead to the abuse of power concerning civil servants,state officials, and judges who accept bribes. To establish legal certainty, criminal liability for bribery may be achieved by amending Article 12(a) of the Corruption Eradication Law as follows: A civil servant or state official who accepts a gift or promise, with knowledge or reasonable suspicion that it is intended to induce him to act or refrain from acting contrary to his obligations, shall face a prison sentence of no less than 1 year and no more than 20 years, in addition to a penalty equivalent to five times the value of the bribe.