Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
Reine Rofiana
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Norma Risca Pratiwi; Ridwan Ridwan; Reine Rofiana
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM KEJAHATAN SIBER TERHADAP INFRASTRUKTUR DIGITAL NEGARA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (STUDI KASUS PERETASAN PUSAT DATA NASIONAL SEMENTARA 2 INDONESIA) Muhammad Faeyza Rabbani Harahap; Aan Asphianto; Reine Rofiana
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v11i1.9457

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has had a positive impact in various areas of life, including government systems. However, on the other hand, this development has also given rise to new forms of digital crime, one of which is cybercrime that targets a country's digital infrastructure. One case that emerged in Indonesia was the hacking of the Temporary National Data Center 2 (PDNS 2) in June 2024, which resulted in disruptions to 239 government agencies and large-scale data leaks. This study aims to analyze the forms of cybercrime against the country's digital infrastructure based on the theory of cybercrime in Indonesian criminal law and to examine the criminal liability of the perpetrators of the PDNS 2 hack. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and case study approach. The data used was sourced from primary and secondary legal materials, including official reports from BSSN and several news media publications. The results of the study show that the hacking of PDNS 2 is a form of cybercrime that falls under the category of unauthorized access to computer systems and services and cyber sabotage, which can be charged under the provisions of Articles 30, 32, 52, and 46 of the ITE Law and Article 482 of the Criminal Code. Although there has been no legal action against the perpetrators to date, normatively, the elements of criminal liability have been fulfilled, including the existence of unlawful acts, fault, the ability to be held responsible, and the absence of justifiable or exculpatory reasons.Keywords: Cyber Crime, State Digital Infrastructure, Hacking, Criminal Liability, ITE Law
Co-Authors Aan Asphianto Muhammad Faeyza Rabbani Harahap Norma Risca Pratiwi Ridwan Ridwan