Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Advances In Education Journal Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Raihan Hadi Prama
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Tafakur Day Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Tindakan Bullying di SMP Al-Amanah Cileunyi dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Diva Raya Naysila Nada; Revameila Susanti; Muhamad Syamsul Maarif; Alif Marta Nurhadi; Raihan Hadi Prama
Advances In Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Advances In Education Journal (Desember)
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Afif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Bullying in the educational environment is a serious violation of children’s rights to security and protection from violence. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness and compatibility of the “Tafakur Day” disciplinary mechanism at SMP Al-Amanah Cileunyi with Human Rights principles, as well as to measure the impact of advocacy interventions in increasing students’ legal awareness. This study employs socio-legal research with a qualitative approach and social intervention involving 52 grade 9 students as role models. Data collection techniques included observation, in-depth interviews, and gamification-based post-tests. The results indicate that Tafakur Day has an educative-religious dimension through Quranic memorization methods (stages 1-3), but the social sanction stages involving public disclosure (stages 4-6) potentially violate children’s rights to privacy and dignity. Furthermore, the advocacy intervention successfully deconstructed students’ understanding of the boundaries between “jokes” and bullying. Based on the post-test evaluation, 70% of students demonstrated a good understanding of bullying parameters. This study recommends integrating the compiled bullying handling module into school policies and evaluating the public disclosure method in Tafakur Day to be more oriented towards restorative justice.
A Comparison of Administrative Dispute Resolution Through The Administrative Court and The Ombudsman (Examining The Differences In Functions, Authority, and Effectiveness of The Two Institutions) Allisya Destari Pratami; Hani Sri Handayani; Raihan Hadi Prama; Sultan Novaliyana Putra
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/btwp4267

Abstract

This study examines and compares the Administrative Court and the Ombudsman as two principal institutions for resolving administrative disputes in Indonesia. The research employs a non empirical normative legal approach using statutory and conceptual methods to analyze legal norms, institutional mandates, and doctrinal principles governing both institutions. Primary legal materials consist of legislation regulating administrative courts, the Ombudsman, and public services, while secondary materials include scholarly literature on administrative law, administrative justice, and public accountability. The findings demonstrate that the Administrative Court functions as a judicial institution focused on legal adjudication and the provision of binding decisions, whereas the Ombudsman operates as a supervisory institution emphasizing maladministration review, complaint handling, and corrective recommendations. The analysis further reveals substantial differences in jurisdictional authority, legal powers, enforcement capacity, and legal consequences of institutional outcomes. The Administrative Court offers stronger legal certainty through enforceable judgments, while the Ombudsman provides greater accessibility, procedural flexibility, and responsiveness. The study concludes that both institutions perform complementary roles within Indonesia’s administrative justice system and collectively contribute to accountability, legal protection, good governance, and the improvement of public administration.
Co-Authors Alif Marta Nurhadi Allisya Destari Pratami Diva Raya Naysila Nada Hani Sri Handayani Muhamad Syamsul Maarif Revameila Susanti Sultan Novaliyana Putra