Mohammad Fikriandi Ramdhansyah
Institut Pendidikan Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kemampuan Membaca Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Dalam Memahami Teks Akademik Berdasarkan Taksonomi Barrett Mohammad Fikriandi Ramdhansyah; Asep Nurjamin
Advances In Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Advances In Education Journal (Februari)
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Afif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to describe the critical reading ability of third-year students in the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Program at the Indonesian Institute of Education in understanding academic texts based on Barrett’s Taxonomy. The research employed a quantitative descriptive design with a survey approach. The participants consisted of 26 students selected through total sampling. Data were collected using a reading comprehension test in the form of essay questions developed according to the five levels of Barrett’s Taxonomy: literal, reorganization, inferential, evaluative, and appreciative. Data analysis was conducted descriptively by calculating scores, percentages, and categorizing students’ levels of critical reading ability. The results indicate that students’ critical reading ability falls into the good category, with an average percentage of 71.60%. The literal indicator obtained the highest score at 83.75%, followed by reorganization (77.00%) and inferential (71.25%). The evaluative and appreciative indicators showed lower scores of 65.50% and 60.50%, respectively. The distribution of scores reveals that 38.46% of students were in the good category and 23.08% in the very good category, while 11.54% remained in the low category. These findings suggest that students are able to understand explicit information, draw conclusions, and evaluate texts logically; however, their reflective and appreciative abilities still need improvement. The application of Barrett’s Taxonomy proved effective in systematically mapping students’ critical reading levelsof abilities. The findings are expected to serve as a basis for developing more structured, contextual, and higher-order-thinking-oriented critical reading instruction in higher education. Kata kunci: critical reading, academic texts, Barrett’s Taxonomy, quantitative descriptive
NARASI MEDIA DAN REPRESENTASI GENDER DALAM PEMBERITAAN INARA RUSLI DI MEDIA ONLINE INDONESIA DENGAN PENDEKATAN SARA MILLS Mohammad Fikriandi Ramdhansyah; Agus Hamdani; Didin Sahidin
JURNAL KONFIKS Vol 13 No 2 (2026): KONFIKS
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/5nayw987

Abstract

News coverage regarding Inara Rusli’s nikah siri in Indonesian online media has generated public debate that is not only related to legal and moral aspects, but also touches on the issue of gender representation in media narratives. The media plays an active role in shaping meanings about women through the way events are constructed, the parties given space to speak, and the perspectives prioritized. This study aims to examine how Indonesian online media represent Inara Rusli in reporting on nikah siri and how gender power relations are built through news texts. The approach used is Sara Mills’ critical discourse analysis with a descriptive qualitative method. The research data consist of news texts from CNN Indonesia, Kapanlagi.com, Inilah.com, and Suaramerdeka.com published in January 2026 and discussing claims of nikah siri involving Inara Rusli and Insanul Fahmi. The results show that the media dominantly positions women as objects of discourse who must prove claims and be accountable for their personal relationships in the public sphere. Meanwhile, men and legal counsel are more often placed as subjects who have narrative authority and legal legitimacy. This narrative pattern shows the media’s tendency to reproduce patriarchal values through emphasis on aspects of proof, morality, and legality directed at women. The analysis also finds that the reader’s perspective is directed to doubt women’s narratives, while women’s voices are often mediated or marginalized. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that reporting on Inara Rusli’s nikah siri in Indonesian online media still shows inequality in gender representation and has not fully applied the principles of gender-sensitive journalism.