Samsudin Samsudin
Universitas Islam Negeri SIBER Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Comparative Study of Islamic Astronomy and Jurisprudence on the Qibla Direction of Historical Mosques in Cirebon Indonesia Kusdiyana Kusdiyana; Samsudin Samsudin; Muhammad Buchori; Roqiyul Ma’arif Syam
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 11, No 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v11i2.4902

Abstract

Determining the correct Qibla direction is of utmost importance for Muslims. However, it is ironic that many people are indifferent to the accuracy of the Qibla direction in local mosques, often relying on religious figures without consulting experts in the field. This negligence often results in inaccurate Qibla directions, especially in historical mosques that still stand today. This study examines several historical mosques in Cirebon, Indonesia, including Pesantren Benda Kerep Mosque, Kramat Kalilunyu Mosque, Kramat Kalijaga Mosque, Masjid Merah Panjunan, and Jagabayan Mosque. Among these, only the Pesantren Benda Kerep Mosque has an accurate Qibla direction according to Islamic astronomy (Ilmu Falak). From a jurisprudential perspective (Fiqh), according to the Hanafi, Maliki, and Hanbali schools of thought, the Qibla directions of the historical mosques—except for Jagabayan Mosque—are still acceptable, as they are classified as facing the general direction of the Kaaba (Jihat al-Ka’bah). In contrast, the Pesantren Benda Kerep Mosque's Qibla precisely faces the physical structure of the Kaaba (‘Ain al-Ka’bah). However, Jagabayan Mosque’s Qibla cannot be tolerated as it deviates beyond the acceptable range according to the Hanafi school's concept of jihat sughra. In the Shafi'i school, the strongest opinion is that only the Pesantren Benda Kerep Mosque qualifies as properly aligned with the Qibla, while the others deviate from the correct direction
Recontextualizing Article 97 of the Indonesian Compilation of Islamic Law: A Maqasid-Based Analysis of Judicial Practices in Joint Property Disputes Supian Daelani; Wasman Wasman; Sugianto Sugianto; Samsudin Samsudin; Randy Vallentino Neonbeni
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.60

Abstract

Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) stipulates that if a marriage ends due to divorce, each surviving widow or widower is entitled to half (50%) of the joint property, unless otherwise stipulated in the marriage agreement. This study aims to review (recontextualize) the application of Article 97 of the KHI from a justice perspective, particularly in cases where the husband and wife's contributions to the acquisition of property are unequal, or where one party (particularly the wife) bears a double burden. The research method used is normative legal research with a conceptual approach and a case-based approach (judgment decisions). The results indicate that the rigid application of Article 97 of the KHI (equal division) often results in substantive injustice, particularly when the wife acts as the primary breadwinner or a housewife who works hard beyond basic obligations while the husband is negligent.  Recontextualization of this article is necessary by shifting the paradigm from "equal distribution" (equality of portion) to "division based on real contribution" (proportional justice) and the principle of Maqasid Sharia (benefit). Supreme Court Judge Decision No. 266 K/AG/2010 provides the basis for the division of joint assets not necessarily being 50:50, but rather taking into account the extent of each party's contribution to the acquisition of the joint assets.