Mohamad Rosyidin
Departemen Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

Analisa Bantuan Luar Negeri Inggris dalam Skema Kerjasama Multistakeholder Forestry Program 3 di Jepara Mia Risa Himalia; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i3.21161

Abstract

Jepara is one of the biggest sector on furniture products in Indonesia. The Quality ofJepara furniture product has grown to various parts of the world. England is one of thebiggest consumer of Jepara furniture products and Europe is part of the cunsomers too.The High export rates of furniture was not comparable with the implementation of SVLKwhich has been agreed between Indonesi and Europe. Jepara was not maximally in theimplementation of SVLK then England with initiatively to provide the assistance to Jeparathrough the scheme of cooperation with MFP 3 that runs in 2014-2016. The researchmethode used is qualitative explaining what the motive of England in providing assistanceto Jepara. Then that motive is analyzed to find the facts behind the attitude from England.To answer the phenomenon, the research using the theory of constructivism. Teh resultshow that the underlying motives of England on providing assistance to Jepara is purely tohelp Jepara in SVLK ownership, beside that is a concrete act assistance of England whichhave the commitment to environment.
ANALISIS PERBEDAAN KEBIJAKAN KONTRATERORISME AMERIKA SERIKAT TERHADAP KELOMPOK TERORIS ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant) DAN BOKO HARAM TAHUN 2014 – 2016 Nabilla Ayu Sekarini Santoso; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i1.22767

Abstract

After 9/11, the U.S. have been so adamant on eradicating terrorism all over the world, and adopted a foreign policy that focuses on counterterrorism named „war on terror‟. The war on terror have been targeting terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, and most recently, its foremost focus is on ISIL. While the U.S. promised to erase all terrorism in the world, the policy still has some imbalance towards whom it applies to. Towards ISIL, the U.S. and its coalition have made subsequent progress on their counterterrorism efforts while towards other groups, such as Boko Haram, the policy application has been stagnant with not much progress. This thesis is a qualitative research using Mill‟s Method of comparative study to see the differences of each policy and will explore and analyze the reasons why the counterterrorism effort of the U.S. is unequal, focusing on its differences of counterterrorism policy towards ISIL and Boko Haram using Analytical Eclecticism as a tool. Furthermore, this thesis will also incorporate defensive realism and liberal internationalism to analyze the possible reasons on why U.S.‟s counterterrorism policy has a difference between whom it applies to. The result of this study shows that U.S. have a political interest in Syria including its rivalry with Russia and its needs to contain Russia‟s power in the Middle East and its interest to topple Assad from the Syrian government.
Bantuan Luar Negeri sebagai Intrumen Diplomasi: Studi Kasus Bantuan Kemanusiaan Rusia kepada Donbas dalam Konflik Rusia-Ukraina 2014-2015 Veronika Suci Novitasari Buntaran; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i3.21065

Abstract

The Russian-Ukrainian conflict reached its peak in 2014. Conflict exacerbated by theexistence of war crimes has caused a humanitarian crisis with various socio-economicimpacts and also increased the number of refugees. Since August 2014, Russia has decidedto issue humanitarian aid policy in the conflict. This research analyzes the motives ofRussia's humanitarian aid policy in Donbas using the theory of neoclassical realism. Theresults reveal that the policy is a strategy to increase Russian influence in Ukraine.Anarchic international structure with nations competing for power became an independentvariable in this research. Putin's view on seeing Russia as a major power and Russia's rolein the international world becomes an intervening variable that translates the internationalsituation into the policy. The strategy of humanitarian aid policy with the motive ofmaintaining influence in Ukraine will also have an impact on the increasing position ofRussia in regional countries that can strengthen its status as a global player.
Sekuritisasi Isu Separatisme Patani, Thailand Selatan dalam Perspektif Konstruktivisme Cintya Wulandari; Hermini Susiatiningsih; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v1i1.19131

Abstract

The escalation in insurgency by Southern Thailand separatist groups that began with the Arion military raid, the Krue-se and Tak Bai incidents in 2004, promted the Thai government to take securitization action against an ethnational nationalist issue that had not previously been considered a political issue. This research aimed an explanation of the securitization process undertaken by the Thai government to construct the ethnonationalist issue of Southern Thailand as a threat to Thailand's national security. This research uses the securitization theory which is focus in speech act. Speech act is the process of securitization where policy makers (stakeholders) gave an official statement to change the public's opinion on the issue.This research uses qualitative method through library literature data. The results of this study found that the process of securitization of ethno-nationalist issues in South Thailand originated from a non-political issue that became a political issue after being constructed by Thai government officials statements by speech act such as "legal action should be taken" and "we mean business" aimed to construct to the Thai community the ethno-nationalist issue of Southern Thailand poses a threat to Thailand's national security.
Menghapus Jejak Kebijakan Masa Lalu: Perubahan Kebijakan AS terkait Isu pencurian Kekayaan Intelektual melalui Media Siber oleh Tiongkok Hafrian Yusuf Ramdhani; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i3.24166

Abstract

This research aims to find out the reason why Donald Trump alter US approach regarding to China Cyber IP theft. Initially, US under Obama administration has reached an agreement on Cyber security issues. Both countries agreed to not conduct or support IP theft through internet. However, as Donald Trump assume Presidency, he prefer imposing tariff on China product due to China Cyber IP theft activity.in analyzing the case this research employ the concept Operational Code by Alexander George. According to George, actor needs beliefs to understand the world and selecting the best means to achieve his ends. This research will apply literature study for data collection and content analysis for data analysis. The main argument of this research is Donald Trump’s rivalry oriented Philosophical beliefs and aggressive instrumental beliefs as the main cause the tariff imposition
Ketidakefektifan Malacca Strait Patrol dalam Mengatasi Pembajakan dan Perompakan di Selat Malaka dan Singapura Muhammad Rizky Pangestu; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i1.22696

Abstract

This research aims to find out the reason why the join patrol in the Malacca Strait and Singapore, the Malacca Straits Patrol (MSP) ineffective to maintain security in the Malacca Strait and Singapore. The ineffective can be seen in the 2014 ReCAAP data where in 2014 there were 44 cases of piracy in the Malacca Strait and Singapore. Up 32 cases from 2013 and in 2015 it rose again to 94 cases. In analyzing the case this research will use realist theory. In the realist theory it is stated that in achieving a goal a country needs its national power. But the national power must be transformed into the real power of the country's government. Then for the data this study uses a literature study. Whereas for data analysis this research uses congruent data analysis. The results of this study indicate that the ineffective of the MSP in tackling cases of piracy and piracy is caused by thelimited military power of MSP members to carry out anti-piracy operations. This condition made worse by the quality of government of Malacca Strait Patrol member countries which are not good because they are not so concerned about these limitations.
RESTRUKTURISASI KEBIJAKAN LUAR NEGERI FILIPINA: UPAYA PRESIDEN RODRIGO DUTERTE UNTUK MENGAKHIRI DEPENDENSI KE AMERIKA SERIKAT Dzulfiqar Fathur Rahman; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i1.22750

Abstract

Under President Rodrigo Duterte, Philippines pursues the so-called independent foreign policy that’s associated with the decline in its special relationship with the United States. By conducting a case study based on the theory of foreign policy restructuring, this research seeks to explain why the Philippines undertake foreign policy change in a dramatic and fundamental manner. Following Holsti, this research argues that the Philippines’ foreign policy restructuring is a response to non-military threat. The United States’ interference in Duterte’s anti-drug campaign and South China Sea (or SCS) policy constitutes such threat. This research finds that non-military threat led the Philippines to restructure its foreign policy that undermines its bilateral relations with the United States, while improving its relations with non-traditional state partners such as China and Russia.
Kegagalan Upaya Mediasi Antara Armenia Dan Azerbaijan Dalam Konflik Nagorno-Karabakh Muhamad Afi Fatoni; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i3.24130

Abstract

After collapse of the Soviet Union, two small republics in the Caucasus region named Armenia and Azerbaijan were involved in a bloody conflict to fight for an autonomous region called Nagorno-Karabakh. The ceasefire finally succeeded with the help of mediation by Russia in 1994. Nonetheless, efforts to reach a peace agreement through the mediation of the OSCE Minsk Group have still not succeeded in achieving doubled progress. Both countries were questioned again engaging in fierce fighting for several years. This study uses the Conflict Triangle theory as a substitute for analyzing the dimensions of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict that is being developed with the process of mediation that has been carried out by the OSCE Minsk Group. The author assumes that currently the mediation carried out only focuses on repairing clothes. The results obtained from this study are that mediation carried out by the OSCE Minsk Group can focus on mediation at the government level only, meanwhile mediation at the community level (track-two diplomacy) relating to contributions related to cultural programs and climate change is not implemented at all , which resulted in a breakdown in the mediation of the reluctance of the public from both sides to compromise.
Pelanggaran Inggris terhadap Konvensi Basel: Digital Dumping Ground di Nigeria Yulius Haryadi; Reni Windiani; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i4.17577

Abstract

This research identifies the causes of the United Kingdom’s violation of the Basel Convention in the case of disposal of electronic waste from United Kingdom to Nigeria in 2003-2010. This research is using grounded theory, the research method draws conclusions and theories from the empirical data. The results of this research showed that the UK's non compliance to the Basel Convention lack of the UK's commitment to environmental and health issues. UK often received a warning from the European Commission and other countries regarding their transgressions of environmental issues at the global and domestic level since UK is more focusing on traditional issues of international relations, such as military, security and political issues. In addition, Nigeria's population demand on used electrical and electronic equipment is quite high, because many citizens are involved in this sector, either as recyclers or consumers. This is why UK continues to dispose its electronic waste to Nigeria.