Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of International Relations Diponegoro
Mohamad Rosyidin
Departemen Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik,Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
3. Peran Aktor Non-Negara dalam Hubungan Internasional: Studi Kasus Human Rights Watch dalam Krisis Kemanusiaan di Myanmar Syarifatul Ula; Hermini Susiatiningsih; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 3, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i3.16758

Abstract

The conflict between Rohingya and Rakhine, make it an attractive domain for state-actor as well as non-state actors, such as Human Rights Watch (HRW). HRW was established to engage in the field of the human rights and have a duty to perform its role in the humanitarian crisis in Myanmar and has involved ethnic Rohingya Muslim. This study is initial attempt to analyse the role of HRW in the humanitarian crisis in Myanmar by using the concept of Transnational Advocacy Network (TAN). This study found that the HRW using strategy of information politics as the more dominant tactics used to carry out the role and activities. Strategies symbolic politics is also used as a campaign to get the attention and support of other interntional actors. But in practice, HRW has not succeeded in carrying out its role in leverage politics strategies, and accountability politics, because HRW too independent and not have oversight of the Myanmar government commitements related to the citizenship rights of Muslim ethnic Rohingya.
11. Kebijakan Indonesia Belum Meratifikasi Statuta Roma 1998 Wakhid Aprizal Maruf; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16681

Abstract

Post WW-II world eyewitnessed one of the darkest age of humanity. Numerous bloodbaths of innocents occurred as forms of tyranny legitimation. Cambodia, Rwanda, and Yugoslavia were three of the abundant infamous degradations of humanity at the 2nd semester of the 20th century. However, under the universal spirit of humanity, international society reacted actively against those inhumane actions ergo UN formed ad hoc tribunal such as ICTY or ICTR. Yet those ad hoc tribunal were considered ineffective ergo the escalation of permanent court demands. This resulted in the birth of Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Rome Statute was positively acclaimed by international society and currently had been ratified by 124 countries. Still, Indonesia were not among them. This thesis would examine Indonesia’s policy of Rome Statute. Through constructivist perspective, this thesis would unfold norms disparities between international norms of Rome Statute and domestic norms of Indonesia. The perception of norms disparity would lead Indonesia to create a congruence of its norms ergo the policy to not ratify Rome Statute yet. To put the finger on the answer, this thesis would also encompass institutional dynamics of ICC and Indonesia’s commitment on Rome Statute, both explicit and implied commitments, started from Megawati’s, SBY’s, to Jokowi’s rule. As the result, it would be concluded whether there is norms disparity as the factor behind Indonesia’s policy to not ratify Rome Statute.
1. Peran Trauma dan Memori dalam Politik Luar Negeri: Studi Kasus Kebijakan Jerman Menerima Pengungsi Suriah 2011-2015 Ratna Kusuma Wardhani; Reni Windiani; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16043

Abstract

The flow of refugees arriving in the Europe Union has made the majority of European countries overwhelmed except for Germany that implements the Open-Door Policy under which the refugees are wholeheartedly welcome especially those coming from Syria. This study aims to analyze why Germany prefers to take a rather unique and unusual approach toward refugees by receiving larger number of Syrian refugees compared to other European states. This study applies the concept of memory and trauma in world politics to explain said phenomena. As widely believed, trauma and memory are two important factors that could affect the pattern of state policies. Written in qualitative approach, this study argues that the open door policy of Germany has been mainly driven by some human tragedy that took place within Germany in the past, namely Holocaust. The conclusion of this study is that the trauma of the Holocaust has created a memory that affects contemporary German politics and its political decision thereafter including in this case, the Open Door Policy.
Co-Authors Hermini Susiatiningsih Ika Riswanti Putranti Ratna Kusuma Wardhani Reni Windiani Syarifatul Ula Wakhid Aprizal Maruf