Reni Windiani
Departemen Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik,Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

7. Penyebab Jepang Melakukan Penangkapan Paus di Antartika I Gusti Krishna Aditama; Reni Windiani; Nadia Farabi
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16613

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out why Japan still continue their whaling program, even though the previous program was banned. Moratorium of whaling for commercial purpose was signed in 1986 by member states of International Whaling Commission. The next year after the moratorium, Japan launched scientific research program named Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA). The second research program which is named JARPA II was banned by International Court of Justice due to violations of some articles on International Convention for Regulation of Whaling. After the banned, Japan is back on doing scientific whaling program. This research is done by using explanatory method, using qualitative analysis technique through accumulating primary and secondary data. Based on green political theory, environmental security, and ecological crime, the main reason why Japan still continue their whale research program is culture. This culture starts to disappear when whaling moratorium was signed. Government of Japan created several policies to address this issue. Supports Institute of Cetacean research for whale research and launched campaign activities to reintroduce whale culture for the people. These evidence proof that culture is the main motive on why Japan still continue their whale research program.
Hambatan Program Human Resources Development Indonesia- Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle dalam Mengurangi Kemiskinan di Aceh Reni Windiani; Nadia Farabi
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i4.17566

Abstract

This research aims to explain the obstacles of HRD program by IMT-GT in reducing thepoverty in Aceh. Various effort had been made to reduce poverty in Aceh. One of them wasthe IMT-GT (Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle) as a sub-regionalcooperation. However, through the HRD (Human Resources Development) program aimsto reduce poverty and improve the quality of life, is not effective either. This research usedqualitative methods, with neo-functionalism theory to prove the hypothesis. The result ofthis research found out that the ineffectiveness of IMT-GT HRD program was caused bythe failure of IMT-GT to create good regional integration and the failure of HRD to workon spillover scheme.
12. Peran ASEANAPOL dalam Pemberantasan Peredaran Narkoba di Indonesia Apriliantin Putri Pamungkas; Reni Windiani; Nadia Farabi
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16682

Abstract

Between 2010 – 2014, the region of Southeast Asia had witnessed the increasing cases of transnational crimes relating to drug trafficking, especially in Indonesia. Therefore, the member states of ASEAN create regional cooperation to overcome said crime in this area. This research aimed to describe the regional cooperation of ASEANAPOL particularly on the role and effort made by the organization to the practice of drug crimes occured in Indonesia. By using descriptive and qualitative method, this research incorporates the framework of international cooperation theory, libreralism institutionalist, and liberalism interdependence to observe the works of ASEANAPOL in dealing with Indonesian drug cases. Set against data from several sources, this research concludes that the role of ASEANAPOL is to facilitate ASEAN regional cooperation and to organize formal and informal meeting among the member states’ law enforcement institutions. Although there are some obstacles to overcome drug crimes in Indonesia, sufficient to say that the number of Indonesian drug cases has decreased following the coordination and cooperation of ASEANAPOL.
1. Peran Trauma dan Memori dalam Politik Luar Negeri: Studi Kasus Kebijakan Jerman Menerima Pengungsi Suriah 2011-2015 Ratna Kusuma Wardhani; Reni Windiani; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16043

Abstract

The flow of refugees arriving in the Europe Union has made the majority of European countries overwhelmed except for Germany that implements the Open-Door Policy under which the refugees are wholeheartedly welcome especially those coming from Syria. This study aims to analyze why Germany prefers to take a rather unique and unusual approach toward refugees by receiving larger number of Syrian refugees compared to other European states. This study applies the concept of memory and trauma in world politics to explain said phenomena. As widely believed, trauma and memory are two important factors that could affect the pattern of state policies. Written in qualitative approach, this study argues that the open door policy of Germany has been mainly driven by some human tragedy that took place within Germany in the past, namely Holocaust. The conclusion of this study is that the trauma of the Holocaust has created a memory that affects contemporary German politics and its political decision thereafter including in this case, the Open Door Policy.
5. Respons Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura terhadap Peningkatan Kasus Pembajakan Kapal di Selat Malaka Tahun 2009-2013 M. Singgih Pangestu; Reni Windiani; Shary Charlotte Pattipeilohy
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16611

Abstract

Strait of Malacca (SOM) is one of the most important strait for global trade shipping, yet there’s an increase activity of sea piracy in 2009 which threatened the safety of shipping through the channel. Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore as SOM’s coastal states who are perceived to be responsible to the security of SOM took numerous policies to cope with the issue. In this research, writer tried to give depth explanation about reason behind various policies taken by states to tackle the piracy. Perspective of Constructivism of International Relations and Buzan’s theory of Securitization are used as research framework. The result of this research showed that there was a correlation between policies taken by ones state with issue perceived as existential threat. Singapore who constructed sea piracy as threat for its nation tend to take extreme counter-measurement to combat piracy, while Indonesia and Malaysia didn’t really give attention to the issue of piracy since they construct other issues such as illegal fishing and human smuggling as threat to their sovereignty.