Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI) SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Pina Rama Deani
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Learning Cycle 9E Learning Model: How Does it Affect Students' Problem Solving Skills? Anna Sintia; Nursilawati Nursilawati; Pina Rama Deani; Niken Diah Warastri; Desma Hemaliyah Apita; Nurul Azizah; Beti Susilawati
Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
Publisher : PT. Pusmedia Group Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61227/arji.v7i3.418

Abstract

Problem-solving skills are essential for achieving optimal learning outcomes. However, student participation in activities that develop these skills remains low, with only about 9% of students actively involved. This indicates a lack of self-confidence and a reluctance to express opinions or participate in discussions, which hinders the development of their problem-solving abilities. The Learning Cycle 9E instructional model is considered effective in enhancing these skills due to its clearly structured learning stages. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the model in increasing student learning engagement at SMA Negeri 15 Bandar Lampung. The study employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design, involving class XII F1 as the experimental group and class XII F2 as the control group, both of which were randomly selected using the simple random sampling technique. The results of the normality test showed that the data in both groups were normally distributed (significance values of 0.077 for the experimental group and 0.647 for the control group). The t-test revealed a significance value of 0.590, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, students who were taught using the Learning Cycle model demonstrated better problem-solving abilities, were more engaged, and were more capable of applying their knowledge in real-life situations compared to those taught using direct instruction
Model Pembelajaran RADEC: Bagaimana Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Peserta Didik? Pina Rama Deani; Ruswanto; Beti Susilawati
SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): April - June | SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Publisher : WISE Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70211/sakalima.v3i2.473

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) learning model in improving students’ learning activeness in Islamic Religious Education at SMP Negeri 1 Purbolinggo. The study employed an experimental method using a Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The sample consisted of two eighth-grade classes selected through simple random sampling: an experimental class taught using the RADEC model and a control class taught through conventional methods. The research instrument was a learning activeness questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability, with a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.82. Data were analyzed using normality, homogeneity, and pooled variance t-tests. The findings revealed that the RADEC learning model had a significant effect on students’ learning activeness, with a significance value of 0.035 < 0.05. Improvements were observed in students’ critical thinking, discussion participation, problem-solving abilities, and creative idea development. The novelty of this study lies in the implementation of the RADEC model in Islamic Religious Education at the junior high school level, focusing on learning activeness. This study contributes to the development of active, collaborative, and meaningful learning strategies.
Co-Authors Anna Sintia Beti Susilawati Desma Hemaliyah Apita Niken Diah Warastri Nursilawati Nursilawati Nurul Azizah Ruswanto