Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal El-Mashlahah Journal of Islamic and Law Studies (JILS)
Tetiana Kolomoiets
Zaporizhzhia National University
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstructing Islamic Intellectual Traditions in Modern Scholarship: Textual Hermeneutics, Historical Context, and Epistemological Transformation Tetiana Kolomoiets; Yevhen Leheza
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v10i1.20143

Abstract

Contemporary Islamic scholarship is undergoing a major transformation as it navigates tensions between preserving classical traditions and adapting to modern contexts. This shift reflects both growing epistemological pluralism and an urgent need for methodological reconstruction. Scholars seek to integrate historical consciousness with contemporary frameworks while maintaining doctrinal fidelity through approaches such as neo-ijtihad and contextual hermeneutics. This study examines how Islamic intellectual traditions can remain rigorous, historically grounded, and contextually relevant. It focuses on the methodological gap between classical jurisprudence and modern hermeneutical practices. The research aims to map the evolution of interpretive methodologies, analyze shifts in textual interpretation, and identify epistemological frameworks that support reconstruction. A qualitative approach is employed, using textual hermeneutics, comparative analysis, and historical-contextual examination. Primary sources include classical jurisprudential works and modern interpretations, while secondary sources consist of academic literature. Data analysis is conducted through thematic coding and cross-textual comparison. The findings show that reconstruction occurs through methodological innovation, integration of historical awareness, and acceptance of epistemological pluralism. Contemporary approaches synthesize traditional jurisprudence with modern knowledge systems. In conclusion, Islamic intellectual traditions demonstrate adaptive capacity through creative engagement with their inherent flexibility. Strengthening collaborative ijtihad, interdisciplinary training, and evaluative frameworks is essential for addressing contemporary ethical, legal, and social challenges.
Restorative Justice Principles in Banjar Customary Inheritance Disputes: A Normative Analysis of Out-of-Court Settlement Institutions through Adat Badamai Akhmad Sukris Sarmadi; Anwar Hafidzi; Nurul Listiyani; Tetiana Kolomoiets; Afif Khalid
El-Mashlahah Vol 15 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.10047

Abstract

Inheritance disputes in Banjar communities continue to increase as families confront controversies over unwritten norms, generational change, and rising land value, creating a growing need for culturally grounded solutions. These disputes reflect a broader trend in Indonesia where communities prefer non-court settlement when judicial rulings risk disrupting social cohesion. Within this plural legal landscape, families must navigate overlapping expectations from customary norms, Islamic law, and state regulations. This study addressed a key gap by examining how restorative justice principles operate within Banjar inheritance practices. Using a qualitative normative method, the research analyzed primary legal materials, documented customary procedures, court decisions, and academic literature. The findings showed that adat badamai integrated restorative values through open dialogue, inclusive deliberation, and relational repair among heirs. The study concluded that adat badamai provides an effective culturally rooted model of restorative justice and recommends stronger legal recognition and enhanced mediator training.
Co-Authors afif khalid Akhmad Sukris Sarmadi Anwar Hafidzi Nurul Listiyani Yevhen Leheza