Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

CNN-Based Facial Image Analysis for Pediatric Down Syndrome Classification Yunidar Yunidar; Inda Mariana Harahap; Melinda Melinda; Rosmawinda Rosmawinda; Nurlida Basir; Aufa Rafiki; Imam Fathur Rahman
Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 8 No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Department of Electromedical Engineering, POLTEKKES KEMENKES SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jeeemi.v8i2.1523

Abstract

Down syndrome (trisomy 21) is a genetic disorder caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21, resulting in distinctive developmental facial characteristics and intellectual delays. Early detection is crucial to enable timely medical intervention. However, conventional diagnostic procedures still rely on clinical observation and genetic testing, which can be invasive and expensive. This study proposes a facial image–based classification system for detecting Down syndrome using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach. Seven CNN architectures were evaluated, namely EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, ResNet34, ShuffleNetV2, AlexNet, VGG19, and InceptionV3, under two training scenarios: with and without early stopping. The dataset consisted of 1,000 facial images of children with and without Down syndrome, split into training, validation, and test sets at 60:20:20. Face detection was performed using the Haar Cascade Classifier, followed by data augmentation techniques including rotation, zoom, translation, horizontal flipping, and Gaussian noise to improve model generalization and reduce overfitting. Experimental results show that the VGG19 architecture achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 94.5%, precision of 91.59%, recall of 98%, and an F1-score of 94.69%. A one-way ANOVA test yielded an F-value of 0.003 and a p-value of 0.955 (> 0.05), indicating no statistically significant difference between models trained with and without early stopping. Grad-CAM visualization highlighted key facial regions, namely the eyes, nose, and mouth, as the primary contributors to classification, while analysis using 68 facial landmark points revealed distinctive morphological patterns associated with Down syndrome. The integration of CNN models, Grad-CAM visualization, and facial landmark analysis demonstrates a promising, interpretable, and non-invasive approach to supporting early Down syndrome screening using facial images
Data Splitting Strategies for Down Syndrome Facial Classification: A Comparative Study Using EfficientNet-B0 and MobileNetV2 Dzaki Dhiya Ul-Haq; Yunidar Yunidar; Melinda Melinda; Nurlida Basir; Rosmawinda Rosmawinda
Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): August
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Elektromedik, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v8i3.338

Abstract

Early identification of Down Syndrome (DS) is essential for timely intervention; however, conventional diagnostic approaches often require specialized clinical expertise and significant resources. Recent advances in deep learning-based facial image analysis offer a promising alternative, yet the impact of data partitioning strategies on model performance and stability remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates the effects of different data-splitting strategies on DS facial image classification using EfficientNet-B0. A total of 3,030 facial images were collected from Roboflow and curated through preprocessing techniques, including Gaussian noise reduction, image sharpening, and contrast enhancement. Two data partitioning configurations, 70:20:10 and 80:10:10, were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, while statistical significance was examined using the Friedman test. The results show that the 70:20:10 configuration achieved an average accuracy of 87.88% ± 3.03%, while the 80:10:10 configuration achieved a slightly higher accuracy of 89.09% ± 2.53%. The Friedman test indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). However, the improvement is relatively marginal, with a small-to-moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.43) and no significant difference in variance (p > 0.05), indicating limited practical significance. A trade-off between accuracy and evaluation stability was observed. While the 80:10:10 configuration benefits from a larger training set, the 70:20:10 configuration provides more stable and balanced performance, particularly in minimizing false negatives. These findings highlight that higher accuracy does not necessarily imply more reliable or clinically meaningful performance, emphasizing the importance of appropriate data partitioning in medical image classification.