Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Aulia Rahmadhani
Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Physics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ARGUMENTATION AND DECISION-MAKING OF GENERATION Z PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS ON ENERGY-RELATED SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES Haryanti Putri Rizal; Saeful Bahri; Marlina Ummas Genisa; Hasri; Aulia Rahmadhani
INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Science Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/insecta.v7i1.11882

Abstract

Energy as a socioscientific issue (SSI) demands the ability to think scientifically, argue rationally, and act ethically in complex real-world context. Future science teachers, particularly those from Generation Z, need to be equipped with these competencies to respond critically and responsibly to such challenges. This study aimed to analyze the quality of argumentation and decision-making among student groups in addressing energy-related socioscientific issues through collaborative discussion. A qualitative descriptive design with content analysis was employed, involving 15 student groups of second semester pre-service science teachers enrolled in matter and energy course across three different classes. Argumentation was analyzed using the Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP), while decision-making was assessed through five aspects: criteria, evidence, perspectives, consequences, and justification. Each component was evaluated using a four-level rubric to determine the quality of students’ responses. The findings revealed that both skills were at a moderate level, with mean scores of 1.93 for argumentation and 2.21 for decision-making. Students were generally able to formulate claims, however, they often lacked strong scientific justification and consideration of alternative viewpoints. Their decisions did not consistently reflect deep reasoning or align with the quality of their argumentation. These findings underscore the importance of integrating socioscientific issues-based instruction into science teacher education to strengthen scientific reasoning, ethical judgment, and evidence-based decision-making.
Pelatihan Pembuatan Makalah pada Siswa SMP Negeri 4 Majene Menuju Generasi Gemar Menulis Aulia Rahmadhani; Nor Indriyanti; Hilman Qudratuddarsi
Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): MEI-AGUSTUS
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM) of the Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/jak.v5i2.4154

Abstract

Writing skills are essential for students to develop from an early age. Writing not only serves as a medium for expressing ideas, opinions, or thoughts, but also functions as a tool to train critical, systematic, and logical thinking. A lack of interest and skill in writing can have negative consequences. Students who are not accustomed to writing may struggle when asked to prepare reports, write essays, or face written exams that require structured argumentation and explanation. Training in academic writing is crucial, especially for junior high school students. This community service activity was carried out in three stages: preparation, implementation, and evaluation. Questionnaire results showed that the academic writing training received a positive response, particularly in terms of enjoyment, usefulness, and student motivation. However, challenges remain in terms of material comprehension, active participation, and self-confidence, which should be addressed through more practical and interactive learning methods in future programs.
Co-Authors Haryanti Putri Rizal Hasri Hilman Qudratuddarsi Marlina Ummas Genisa Nor Indriyanti Saeful Bahri