Suryani Intan Pratiwi Puwa
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Formalizing the Informal: A Critical Examination of Indonesia's Land Certification Program (PTSL) and Its Implications for Tenure Security and Social Equity Henny Saida Flora; Seno Wibowo Gumbira2; Jimmy Nasroen; Dwi Nurahman; Suryani Intan Pratiwi Puwa
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): February-May
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v4i3.1889

Abstract

Indonesia’s Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap, PTSL) has been heralded as a transformative initiative in the Global South’s land governance landscape. Launched in 2017 with the ambitious goal of registering all 126 million land parcels by 2025, the program has achieved a 94.4% registration rate. Despite this quantitative success, the program’s qualitative impacts on tenure security and social equity remain contested. This article critically examines PTSL through a qualitative, socio-legal lens, drawing on policy document analysis, semi-structured interviews with institutional actors, and case studies from three Indonesian provinces. The findings reveal a paradoxical outcome: while PTSL has significantly accelerated formal land registration, its procedural architecture ironically reproduces, rather than rectifies, pre-existing structural inequalities. Informal land tenure practices—customary ownership, inherited but undocumented rights, and gendered access—are systematically marginalized within the program’s bureaucratic framework. The certification process imposes financial burdens through BPHTB taxes that disproportionately exclude low-income households, while weak verification mechanisms have enabled land-grabbing by elite actors. Consequently, the program’s formalization agenda risks extinguishing long-standing customary tenure arrangements and reinforcing social stratification. The article argues that the technocratic focus on target attainment has fundamentally overshadowed substantive tenure security and distributive justice. It concludes by proposing a rights-based, community-centered model of land certification that recognizes legal pluralism, integrates gender-responsive mechanisms, and prioritizes protection of vulnerable groups
The Paradox of Judicial Power: The Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Activism in the Post‑Ahok Era and Its Impact on Electoral Democracy Christopher Panal Lumban Gaol; Samuel Frans Boris Situmorang; Seno Wibowo Gumbira; Irsyad Sudirman; Suryani Intan Pratiwi Puwa
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): June-September
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v5i1.1957

Abstract

This study investigates the paradoxical role of the Indonesian Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi, MK) in shaping electoral democracy after the 2017 Jakarta gubernatorial election that convicted Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) for blasphemy. While judicial activism is generally seen as a mechanism to defend constitutional rights, the post‑Ahok period witnessed a surge in MK rulings that override electoral commissions and construct new legal norms, often with majoritarian and exclusionary undertones. Employing a panel fixed‑effects regression on 34 Indonesian provinces from 2014 to 2023, this research quantitatively examines the relationship between MK activism in electoral disputes and provincial electoral democracy scores. The independent variable, a novel Judicial Activism Index (JAI), captures annual counts of MK decisions that annulled KPU determinations or introduced expansive interpretations in pemilu and pilkada cases. The results reveal a significant negative interaction effect between the JAI and the Post‑Ahok dummy (2017–2023) on the Provincial Electoral Democracy Score. In the post‑Ahok period, a one‑unit increase in activist rulings is associated with a 1.8‑point decline in democratic quality, controlling for economic and political covariates. The findings unveil a paradox: a court empowered to guard democracy can, under conditions of heightened identity politics, become a vehicle for democratic regression. The study calls for recalibrating the MK’s self‑restraint doctrine to prevent judicial overreach from undermining electoral pluralism