Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Punishment For Motor Vehicle Theft With Violence (Judgment No. 596/Pid.B/2023/PN Jkt.Brt) Nadya Nadzifatur Rahma; Siti Marwiyah; M. Yustino Aribawa; Bachrul Amiq; Wahyu Prawesthi
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 5 No 6 (2026): IJHESS JUNE 2026
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v5i6.2269

Abstract

This article analyzes the judicial reasoning in West Jakarta District Court Decision No. 596/Pid.B/2023/PN Jkt.Brt concerning motor vehicle theft with violence, with a focus on the defendant’s attempt to distance himself from the violent elements of the crime. Such a defense strategy is conceptually parallel to exoneration clauses in contract law, which seek to exclude or limit liability. Through the lens of Radbruch’s triadic values of law justice, legal certainty, and utility, the study highlights the contradictions arising from the judicial rejection of exoneration claims in collective violent crimes. While exoneration clauses serve to ensure fairness and proportionality in civil contexts, their transposition into criminal law risks undermining deterrence and public order. Empirical observations reveal inconsistent judicial interpretations in Indonesia, compounded by institutional limitations and lack of specialized consumer or criminal law adjudication. Comparative insights from the European Union and Australia underscore the importance of regulatory clarity and strict enforcement to safeguard fairness in contractual and criminal contexts alike. The article concludes by proposing a normative framework for reform that emphasizes clearer sentencing guidelines, statutory restrictions on exoneration in collective crimes, and alignment with international best practices. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on balancing fairness, legal certainty, and public protection in Indonesian criminal law.
Legal Analysis of Forged Property Rights Certificates Used as Collateral by Banks Wimbo Bintoro; Yoyok Ucuk Suyono; Subekti Subekti; M. Yustino Aribawa; Bachrul Amiq
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 5 No 6 (2026): IJHESS JUNE 2026
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v5i6.2318

Abstract

The use of land title certificates (Sertifikat Hak Milik/SHM) as collateral in Indonesian banking practices faces a significant legal and institutional gap due to the proliferation of counterfeit documents. This study investigates the normative inadequacies that fail to protect bona fide creditors from the consequences of forged SHM. Using a normative juridical method, this doctrinal legal research analyzes statutory instruments, case law, and legal doctrines, particularly Government Regulation No. 24/1997, Law No. 10/1998, and the Basic Agrarian Law. Findings reveal persistent structural weaknesses in certificate verification systems, institutional fragmentation, and a lack of preventive legal frameworks. The absence of electronic authentication mandates, strict liability for negligent PPATs or notaries, and civil protection for defrauded creditors underscores systemic risk. The study proposes a Unified Certificate Verification System (SVST), mandatory digital verification, blockchain-based registration, land title insurance, and legal reform to enforce due diligence and institutional accountability. It concludes that Indonesia’s current framework fails to ensure legal certainty and justice for financial institutions, and urgent structural reform is needed to enhance transparency, minimize transactional risks, and restore public trust in land-based financial transactions.
Implementation Of Fisheries Commodity Shipments From Ambon By The Company Agusnal Fitralius Hakim; Nur Handayati; Wahyu Prawesthi; Subekti Subekti; Bachrul Amiq
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10804

Abstract

The fisheries sector plays a strategic role in Indonesia's economic development as an archipelagic country with abundant marine resources. In addition to being a source of food, this sector is also a leading export commodity that contributes to the country's foreign exchange. Law No. 31 of 2004 stipulates that every fishing business must have a permit, and every shipment of fishery products must be accompanied by valid documents such as SKAI and quarantine certificates. However, practices in the field still show violations of these provisions, such as the shipment of fish without complete documents and not through official ports of call. Cases in Ambon show that shipments are often made in a hurry to meet export schedules, resulting in the neglect of legal aspects. This condition is exacerbated by weak supervision, limited supervisory human resources, and abuse of authority. As a result, the country stands to lose in terms of revenue and export reputation. From a criminal law perspective, such violations are punishable under Article 93 of Law No. 31 of 2004, with a maximum penalty of 6 years imprisonment and a fine of Rp 2 billion. Although administrative and criminal sanctions are available, their implementation still faces challenges in terms of enforcement and legal certainty.