Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen terhadap Peredaran Kosmetik Tidak Berizin Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) Ditinjau daari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Rama Kurnianto; Anisa Fauziah; Sugeng Samiyono
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/zywxkf24

Abstract

The cosmetics industry in Indonesia is growing rapidly, but is accompanied by the rampant circulation of illegal products without BPOM distribution permits, which endanger consumers. These product often contain hazardous ingredients, are harmful to health, and undermine healthy industry competition. Consumers, who still lack literacy, are vulnerable to misleading promotions and low prices. Therfore, it is important to strengthen legal protection and supervision from BPOM to ensure product safety and protect consumer rights. The issues addressed in this thesis are: How are consumers who use cosmetics that are not licensed by the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) protected by law in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, and how does the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) minimize the circulation of illegal cosmetics among the public? The research method used is an empirical juridicial method using data from interviews and various literature, journals, and laws and reguations. The data analysis used is normative qualitative. The results of the study show that legal protection for consumers of illegal cosmetics is a manifestation of consumers rights theories and the absolute responsibility of businnes actors. The Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) guarantees consumers’ rights to safety and information, which are directly violated by the distribution of cosmetics without BPOM permission. The UUPK also requires a preventive approach through education and a curative approach through supervision and sanctions. Thus, BPOM applies the theory of absolute responsibility to protect consumers and provide a deterrent effect.
Perlindungan Hukum Korban Begal Dalam Upaya Pembelaan Terpaksa Di Tinjau Berdasarkan Pasal 49 KUHP Anisa Fauziah; Yudha Ananta Putra; Edy Mulyanto
Pamulang Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Agustus 2024
Publisher : Prodi Hukum S1 - Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/palrev.v7i1.43287

Abstract

Not everyone who becomes a victim Robbery is silent and resigned. There are also victims of robbery who make every effort to defend themselves, their property, their honor, and their lives. In an effort to protect himself, someone who fights back by attacking the perpetrator who tries to take his property is a form of defense from someone under compulsion or in the Criminal Code is known as Noodweer. This study uses a type of normative research. The data collection method used in this research is library research. The source of the data in this study is secondary data, namely data obtained indirectly from the source from literature studies that have a relationship with the research object taken in the protection of robbery victims in perforce reviewed. Noodweer is used as a justification, but not as a reason to justify an unlawful act, but rather someone who is forced to commit a crime is forgiven because there was a violation of the law that preceded the act. The causal relationship between attack and mental shock is perforce reviewed, and cannot eliminate the nature of breaking the law, but in conditions of mental shock, it can be a justifying reason or excuse that can abolish the punishment. Legislators must provide more detailed explanations of the articles so that they are more easily understood by the public, besides that it is hoped that there will be an update from the colonial Criminal Code into a new law. In addition, law enforcement officials must be able to pay more attention to the problem of victims with dual status so that legal protection for victims with dual status gets clarity about the rights they deserve.