Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Flogging of the Imams and the Forging of Islamic Constitutionalism Kurniawan Arif Maspul; Hasbi Yusron; Aditia Nugraha
Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): April
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/pssh.v3i4.639

Abstract

This study examines the foundational struggle between independent jurists and caliphal power during the Umayyad–Abbasid transition as a critical juncture in Islamic political thought. Through a qualitative historical-comparative analysis that process‑traces the principled resistance of Imams Abū Ḥanīfa and Mālik ibn Anas, it demonstrates how their refusal of state appointments, endurance of torture, and assertion of law above the ruler forged an enduring “separation of powers.” The analysis reveals that their stances institutionalised the ulama as autonomous guardians of Sharia, insulating legal pluralism—the four Sunni schools—from executive manipulation and creating a proto‑constitutional order centuries before Western analogues. The study further traces how this dynamic shaped legitimacy bargains, financial independence, and the soft power of transnational scholarly networks, yielding a normative architecture that constrained tyranny and preserved a vibrant legal tradition. Contemporary implications are drawn for judicial independence, academic freedom, and accountable governance in Muslim‑majority states, anchoring global rule‑of‑law principles in indigenous Islamic heritage.
Sovereign Hedging from the Ottoman Lessons to the Global South’s Strategic Resilience Kurniawan Arif Maspul; Aditia Nugraha; Hasbi Yusron
Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/pssh.v3i2.507

Abstract

This paper develops a pluralistic framework for strategic resilience tailored to Global South states confronting great-power rivalry, cascading transnational shocks, and the erosion of multilateral governance. It employs a systematic literature review and a qualitative multi-method design incorporating historical analysis of Ottoman Arab integration and contemporary case studies of the South China Sea and the Russia–Ukraine war. The study synthesises theoretical insights from realism, liberal institutionalism, constructivism, post-colonial critique, and New Security Studies to forge an integrated analytic lens. Findings identify five interlocking policy pillars: strategic autonomy and defence self-reliance; economic and energy resilience; innovative, issue-based alliances and forums; inclusive peacebuilding and ethical security; and technological and normative innovation. Operational recommendations include regional security pilots, a Global South strategic reserves consortium, joint defence-production pacts, and sustained investment in diplomatic cadres and civil-society track-two networks. Priority areas emphasise sustainable defence practices, food and energy sovereignty, supply-chain diversification, and norm entrepreneurship linking disarmament, development finance, and digital governance. The approach explains how diverse hedging, institutional design, narrative construction, and local capacity-building can reduce dependency while maintaining cooperative diplomacy by combining historical parallels and modern empirical evidence; it offers an actionable policy blueprint enabling Global South actors to translate geopolitical disruptions into durable autonomy, equitable development and resilient peace. Recommendations require transparent governance, rigorous financing mechanisms, accountability metrics and sustained South-South partnerships for long-term strategic impact and moral legitimacy.