Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia Derin Fernanda Ainun Nisa; Rumawi Rumawi; Ahmad Junaidi; Supianto Supianto; Mohammad Ali; Udiyo Basuki; Sri Astutik; Asmarani Tri Andari
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The KPPU has the authority to act as an investigator and decision-maker in cases that have the potential to be misused on a large scale. The KPPU's decision-making authority complicates its position in the state system, especially considering its multifunctional role. The objectives of this study are: 1. To explain the KPPU's authority. 2. To describe the KPPU's authority in the judicial system. This study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that 1. Based on the explanation above, the essence of the KPPU's authority, as outlined by Indonesian competition law, is as follows: First, Investigation, Second, Examination, Third, Evidence, Fourth, Sanctions and Decisions, Fifth, Supervision and Law Enforcement. 2. Determining the limits of a state's power has become an important component in running a state system. As explained by Jimly in his research, which mentions the true concept of the separation of powers of a state. Then, regarding the duties and authorities held by the KPPU, the researcher assesses that this does not deviate from the principle of limiting state power. Because the implementation of these authorities and duties falls within the domain of the executive branch of government and administrative functions, the KPPU has extensive authority to decide cases and impose sanctions, which are not far from administrative sanctions

Legal Analysis of Handover Report (BAST) Clauses in Indonesian Government Hospital Construction Contracts Rudy Hartono; Sri Astutik; Nur Handayati; Fitri Ayuningtyas
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6808

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal framework, contractual structure, legal compliance, and potential risks arising from the implementation of the Handover Report (Berita Acara Serah Terima/BAST) clause in the Ministry of Health Vertical Hospital Construction Project in Surabaya, Indonesia.Research Methodology: The study employs an empirical legal research approach with a socio-legal perspective. Data were collected through document analysis, in-depth interviews, and observations involving key project stakeholders. The data were analyzed qualitatively using NVivo 12 Plus to identify dominant themes, patterns, and legal issues related to BAST implementation.Results: The findings indicate that although BAST has a clear legal basis under Indonesian construction and procurement regulations, the regulatory framework lacks detailed provisions regarding risk allocation, post-handover liability, and latent defects. NVivo analysis shows that ambiguity in post-handover responsibility is the most dominant issue. The study also identifies significant gaps between national practices and international standards such as FIDIC, particularly in defect notification periods and post-completion claims.Conclusions: The BAST clause primarily functions as an administrative document rather than a comprehensive legal instrument for risk management. Stronger contractual clarity is required to enhance legal certainty, accountability, and dispute prevention in public construction projects.Limitations: The study is limited to a single case and focuses on legal and contractual dimensions.Contributions: This research contributes to construction contract law by providing empirical evidence on legal gaps in BAST implementation and offering recommendations for improving contractual risk allocation in public infrastructure projects.

Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana di Bawah Ancaman Minimum Perkara Narkotika Riefki Syahdan Susandy; Sri Astutik; Renda Aranggraeni
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 11: Oktober 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i11.20420

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana di bawah ancaman minimum khusus pada perkara tindak pidana narkotika serta menilai kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian mengkaji Putusan PN Banda Aceh Nomor 57/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bna, Putusan PT Banda Aceh Nomor 288/PID.SUS/2025/PT BNA, dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 12183 K/Pid.Sus/2025. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Agung menjatuhkan pidana 3 tahun penjara di bawah batas minimum 5 tahun Pasal 114 ayat (1) UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 dengan mempertimbangkan fakta bahwa terdakwa hanya menguasai sabu seberat 0,38 gram untuk dikonsumsi sendiri, bukan jaringan pengedar. Hakim mengedepankan keadilan substantif dan kepastian hukum yang berkeadilan dengan mempedomani SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2015. Penjatuhan pidana di bawah minimum khusus dibenarkan secara hukum guna menghindari disparitas dan ketidakadilan, sepanjang didasarkan pada pertimbangan rasional dan objektif.

Legal Analysis of Handover Report (BAST) Clauses in Indonesian Government Hospital Construction Contracts Rudy Hartono; Sri Astutik; Nur Handayati; Fitri Ayuningtyas
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6808

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal framework, contractual structure, legal compliance, and potential risks arising from the implementation of the Handover Report (Berita Acara Serah Terima/BAST) clause in the Ministry of Health Vertical Hospital Construction Project in Surabaya, Indonesia.Research Methodology: The study employs an empirical legal research approach with a socio-legal perspective. Data were collected through document analysis, in-depth interviews, and observations involving key project stakeholders. The data were analyzed qualitatively using NVivo 12 Plus to identify dominant themes, patterns, and legal issues related to BAST implementation.Results: The findings indicate that although BAST has a clear legal basis under Indonesian construction and procurement regulations, the regulatory framework lacks detailed provisions regarding risk allocation, post-handover liability, and latent defects. NVivo analysis shows that ambiguity in post-handover responsibility is the most dominant issue. The study also identifies significant gaps between national practices and international standards such as FIDIC, particularly in defect notification periods and post-completion claims.Conclusions: The BAST clause primarily functions as an administrative document rather than a comprehensive legal instrument for risk management. Stronger contractual clarity is required to enhance legal certainty, accountability, and dispute prevention in public construction projects.Limitations: The study is limited to a single case and focuses on legal and contractual dimensions.Contributions: This research contributes to construction contract law by providing empirical evidence on legal gaps in BAST implementation and offering recommendations for improving contractual risk allocation in public infrastructure projects.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search