Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL RECHTENS Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Sri Astutik
Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia Derin Fernanda Ainun Nisa; Rumawi Rumawi; Ahmad Junaidi; Supianto Supianto; Mohammad Ali; Udiyo Basuki; Sri Astutik; Asmarani Tri Andari
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The KPPU has the authority to act as an investigator and decision-maker in cases that have the potential to be misused on a large scale. The KPPU's decision-making authority complicates its position in the state system, especially considering its multifunctional role. The objectives of this study are: 1. To explain the KPPU's authority. 2. To describe the KPPU's authority in the judicial system. This study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that 1. Based on the explanation above, the essence of the KPPU's authority, as outlined by Indonesian competition law, is as follows: First, Investigation, Second, Examination, Third, Evidence, Fourth, Sanctions and Decisions, Fifth, Supervision and Law Enforcement. 2. Determining the limits of a state's power has become an important component in running a state system. As explained by Jimly in his research, which mentions the true concept of the separation of powers of a state. Then, regarding the duties and authorities held by the KPPU, the researcher assesses that this does not deviate from the principle of limiting state power. Because the implementation of these authorities and duties falls within the domain of the executive branch of government and administrative functions, the KPPU has extensive authority to decide cases and impose sanctions, which are not far from administrative sanctions
Legal Analysis of Handover Report (BAST) Clauses in Indonesian Government Hospital Construction Contracts Rudy Hartono; Sri Astutik; Nur Handayati; Fitri Ayuningtyas
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6808

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal framework, contractual structure, legal compliance, and potential risks arising from the implementation of the Handover Report (Berita Acara Serah Terima/BAST) clause in the Ministry of Health Vertical Hospital Construction Project in Surabaya, Indonesia.Research Methodology: The study employs an empirical legal research approach with a socio-legal perspective. Data were collected through document analysis, in-depth interviews, and observations involving key project stakeholders. The data were analyzed qualitatively using NVivo 12 Plus to identify dominant themes, patterns, and legal issues related to BAST implementation.Results: The findings indicate that although BAST has a clear legal basis under Indonesian construction and procurement regulations, the regulatory framework lacks detailed provisions regarding risk allocation, post-handover liability, and latent defects. NVivo analysis shows that ambiguity in post-handover responsibility is the most dominant issue. The study also identifies significant gaps between national practices and international standards such as FIDIC, particularly in defect notification periods and post-completion claims.Conclusions: The BAST clause primarily functions as an administrative document rather than a comprehensive legal instrument for risk management. Stronger contractual clarity is required to enhance legal certainty, accountability, and dispute prevention in public construction projects.Limitations: The study is limited to a single case and focuses on legal and contractual dimensions.Contributions: This research contributes to construction contract law by providing empirical evidence on legal gaps in BAST implementation and offering recommendations for improving contractual risk allocation in public infrastructure projects.
Co-Authors Ahmad Junaidi Asmarani Tri Andari Derin Fernanda Ainun Nisa Fitri Ayuningtyas Mohammad Ali Nur Handayati Rudy Hartono Rumawi Rumawi Supianto Supianto Udiyo Basuki