Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi
Alvin Yahya
PDIH UNS
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Determining the Legal Identity of Murābaḥah: Akad Design, Documentary Sequence, and Juridical Consequences in Indonesian Islamic Banking Alvin Yahya; Burhanudin Harahap; Solikhah Solikhah
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 8 No. 1 May 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v8i1.14378

Abstract

The accuracy of akad design is central to determining the legal identity of Sharia financing contracts in Indonesian Islamic banking, particularly in murābaḥah. While prior studies emphasize Sharia compliance, governance, and product standardization, limited attention has been given to how clause architecture and documentary sequence affect whether murābaḥah remains legally identifiable as a sale-based contract. This article examines three issues: the role of akad design in clarifying legal relations between banks and customers; the juridical consequences of inaccurate design, including nullity and wanprestasi; and the use of Religious Court decisions as empirical references for harmonizing civil law, Sharia principles, and regulatory frameworks. Using a normative-doctrinal approach, the study analyzes the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 21 of 2008, Law No. 4 of 2023, POJK provisions, KHES, DSN-MUI fatwas, OJK standards, and two Pekanbaru Religious Court decisions. The findings show that murābaḥah’s legal identity depends on coherence between subject matter, price, margin, procurement sequence, ownership or control, wakālah authority, and handover documentation. Inaccurate design leads to different consequences across validity and performance tracks. The study identifies recurring documentary failures and argues for a shift from macro-level compliance toward micro-level contractual architecture, emphasizing stronger pre-akad disclosure, coherent documentary chains, and clearer separation between validity and performance in dispute resolution.
Co-Authors Burhanudin Harahap Solikhah Solikhah