Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal
Indah Prabawati
Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Ilmu Administrasi Negara
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Krembangan Utara, Pabean Cantian District, Surabaya Indah Ramadhani; Tjitjik Rahaju; Indah Prabawati; Ahmad Niar Hilmi
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 10 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to describe the evaluation of PKH in Krembangan Utara Village, Surabaya City. This research used a qualitative approach with a descriptive research type. Research subjects were determined using purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. The research focus employed William N. Dunn’s public policy evaluation theory, consisting of effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis techniques used were data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that PKH in Krembangan Utara Village still faces several obstacles in its implementation. In terms of effectiveness, the objectives of PKH have generally been achieved, although the benefits have not been fully felt by all beneficiary families. In terms of efficiency, facilitators still face task limitations and insufficient operational funds. The adequacy indicator has not shown optimal results because assistance remains limited in meeting all the basic needs of beneficiary families. Equity has also not been implemented properly, as there are still beneficiaries who do not match the criteria stipulated in the regulations. Responsiveness is considered very good due to the existence of complaint mechanisms and direct assistance. In terms of accuracy, PKH has not fully addressed the problems faced by poor families because the program benefits have not been fully experienced by all beneficiary families.               
Implementasi Program Beasiswa Pemuda Tangguh di SMK Negeri 12 Surabaya Alda Dewi Weston; Indah Prabawati; Suci Megawati; Tauran T
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 4, No 1 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation of the Youth Resilience Scholarship Program using the policy implementation model of Van Meter and Van Horn. This research employed a qualitative method with a descriptive design. The research was conducted at SMK Negeri 12 Surabaya. Informants were selected purposively and included the Vice Principal for Student Affairs, officials from the Governance and Public Welfare Division (Bapemkesra) of the Surabaya City Government, the school program coordinator, and scholarship recipient students. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation using interview guides, observation guides, and documentation as research instruments. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. The results indicate that the implementation of the Youth Resilience Scholarship Program has generally been carried out quite well. The variables of policy standards and objectives, inter-organizational communication and enforcement activities, economic, social, and political conditions, as well as the disposition of implementers, were categorized as good. Meanwhile, the variables of resources and the characteristics of implementing agencies have not been fully optimal due to limitations in human resources, technical issues in the reporting system, and the lack of integrated access to scholarship recipient data between the government and schools. It can be concluded that the program has contributed to supporting students' educational continuity; however, improvements are still.
Evaluation of Education Funding Policy: A Case Study of the Surabaya “Pemuda Tangguh” Scholarship Program Tara Avrilyana Desvita; Meilisa Mufarocha; Andhika Abhinaya Ivanda; Indah Prabawati; Firre An Suprapto
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 9 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19818329

Abstract

Education is the most crucial aspect in measuring the progress of a nation. The Government of Indonesia guarantees the right to education and finances basic education for its citizens as part of its responsibility to educate the nation. However, the compulsory education program has not been fully realized, as evidenced by the existence of children who have not yet received formal education. One of the efforts made by the Surabaya City Government to improve access to education for underprivileged students in Surabaya is by launching the Pemuda Tangguh Scholarship Program. This study aims to evaluate the Pemuda Tangguh Scholarship Program in Surabaya. The research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data collection techniques include observation and interviews with research subjects. The subjects consist of scholarship coordinators and student beneficiaries of the program. The study analyzes the program using policy evaluation theory proposed by William N. Dunn, which includes six indicators: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. The results show that the scholarship program has succeeded in expanding access to higher education, particularly for students enrolled in private universities in Surabaya. However, there are significant challenges related to the adequacy of financial assistance and responsiveness to public aspirations, especially concerning the reduction in the amount of aid, which has triggered complaints from beneficiaries.
Co-Authors Ahmad Niar Hilmi Alda Dewi Weston Andhika Abhinaya Ivanda Firre An Suprapto Indah Ramadhani Meilisa Mufarocha Suci Megawati Tara Avrilyana Desvita Tauran T Tjitjik Rahaju