Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Automatic Analysis of Political Discourse: A Comparative Study of Multilingual and Large Language Models Ayaulym Sairanbekova; Aizhan Nazyrova; Gulmira Bekmanova; Lena Zhetkenbay; Banu Yergesh; Zhanar Lamasheva
Journal of Applied Data Sciences Vol 7, No 2: May 2026
Publisher : Bright Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47738/jads.v7i2.1118

Abstract

This paper proposes the growing importance of automated analysis of political discourse in low-resource languages, using the Kazakh language as a case study. As political communication in Kazakhstan has increasingly moved online between 2019 and 2023, the need for accurate tools to evaluate political sentiment has grown. However, limited linguistic resources in Kazakh have hindered tool development. This paper introduces the first annotated corpus of political discourse in Kazakh, comprising 3,022 sentences selected from official statements, televised debates, policy documents, and social media publications. Each text was manually annotated for political sentiment by expert linguists and political scientists, with inter-annotator agreement measured to confirm reliability. Two main methodological approaches were employed for automatic sentiment classification: adapting multilingual neural network models to the Kazakh corpus and testing advanced generative language models in scenarios with minimal training examples. Performance was evaluated using standard classification procedures. The inclusion of pragmatic features such as code-switching, rhetorical emphasis, and discursive context led to notable improvements in classification accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that models adapted to multilingual input achieved high classification quality, with fine-tuned multilingual transformer models reaching F₁-scores of up to 0.90, while large language models reached an F₁-score of 0.94 in few-shot settings. Explicit modeling of code-switching and pragmatic features yielded an improvement of approximately 4 percentage points in F₁. This research contributes a practical resource and a methodological framework for analyzing political sentiment in underrepresented languages, highlighting the feasibility of developing high-quality automated tools for political text analysis without extensive training data.
A Hybrid Intelligent Cybersecurity Assessment System For Electronic Document Management Systems Assylzhan Svanov; Assel Omarbekova; Gulmira Bekmanova; Alibek Barlybayev; Bibigul Razakhova; Lena Zhetkenbay; Magripa Saukhanova; Aizhan Nazyrova; Zhanar Lamasheva
Journal of Applied Data Sciences Vol 7, No 3: September 2026
Publisher : Bright Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47738/jads.v7i3.1492

Abstract

Electronic document management systems concentrate confidential and commercially sensitive information behind a single perimeter, making them a high-priority cyberattack target, while existing assessment methods remain largely static, checklist-based, or single-technique, poorly capturing configuration dynamics or prioritizing measures by expected risk reduction. The objective is to develop and validate an intelligent system for the quantitative, explainable cybersecurity assessment of such systems. The novelty and contribution are a hybrid architecture jointly integrating Mamdani fuzzy inference, a stacking ensemble of machine-learning classifiers (random forest, gradient boosting, and a multilayer perceptron), and a Bayesian threat network with an attack graph, unified by a shared domain ontology of document-management assets and threats weighted by confidentiality, integrity, and availability. These heterogeneous estimates are aggregated into a composite cybersecurity assessment index via a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with adaptive re-weighting from confirmed incidents, while a two-level explainability layer traces each score to its features, fired rules, and probable attack paths. The system was evaluated on 10,239 labelled configuration states from an operational deployment using cross-validation, comparison against seven baseline models, and an ablation study. It achieved the best results among all compared approaches, with an F1-score of 0.946, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.927, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.972 – a gain of 2.4 percentage points over the strongest baseline and 10.4 over logistic regression – and the ablation study confirmed that the fuzzy and Bayesian components contribute complementary gains. These findings show that combining data-driven learning with expert-interpretable reasoning yields a more accurate and stable assessment than any single paradigm, and indicate that the framework can support continuous, evidence-based cybersecurity monitoring in document-centric organizations, with future work on adversarial robustness and multi-organization validation.