Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Hybrid Intelligent Cybersecurity Assessment System For Electronic Document Management Systems Assylzhan Svanov; Assel Omarbekova; Gulmira Bekmanova; Alibek Barlybayev; Bibigul Razakhova; Lena Zhetkenbay; Magripa Saukhanova; Aizhan Nazyrova; Zhanar Lamasheva
Journal of Applied Data Sciences Vol 7, No 3: September 2026
Publisher : Bright Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47738/jads.v7i3.1492

Abstract

Electronic document management systems concentrate confidential and commercially sensitive information behind a single perimeter, making them a high-priority cyberattack target, while existing assessment methods remain largely static, checklist-based, or single-technique, poorly capturing configuration dynamics or prioritizing measures by expected risk reduction. The objective is to develop and validate an intelligent system for the quantitative, explainable cybersecurity assessment of such systems. The novelty and contribution are a hybrid architecture jointly integrating Mamdani fuzzy inference, a stacking ensemble of machine-learning classifiers (random forest, gradient boosting, and a multilayer perceptron), and a Bayesian threat network with an attack graph, unified by a shared domain ontology of document-management assets and threats weighted by confidentiality, integrity, and availability. These heterogeneous estimates are aggregated into a composite cybersecurity assessment index via a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with adaptive re-weighting from confirmed incidents, while a two-level explainability layer traces each score to its features, fired rules, and probable attack paths. The system was evaluated on 10,239 labelled configuration states from an operational deployment using cross-validation, comparison against seven baseline models, and an ablation study. It achieved the best results among all compared approaches, with an F1-score of 0.946, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.927, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.972 – a gain of 2.4 percentage points over the strongest baseline and 10.4 over logistic regression – and the ablation study confirmed that the fuzzy and Bayesian components contribute complementary gains. These findings show that combining data-driven learning with expert-interpretable reasoning yields a more accurate and stable assessment than any single paradigm, and indicate that the framework can support continuous, evidence-based cybersecurity monitoring in document-centric organizations, with future work on adversarial robustness and multi-organization validation.
Ontology-Driven Adaptive Learning Environment Using Large Language Models for Educational Knowledge Extraction Rakhila Turebayeva; Bulat Kubekov; Yenglik Kadyr; Umut Turusbekova; Aizhan Nazyrova; Zhanar Lamasheva
Journal of Applied Data Sciences Vol 7, No 3: September 2026
Publisher : Bright Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47738/jads.v7i3.1456

Abstract

Enriching educational ontologies automatically from low-resource-language text remains an unsolved integration problem: conventional large language model (LLM)-to-knowledge-graph pipelines require a vocabulary-alignment step and lack hallucination control at the commit boundary. This study removes both bottlenecks and tests whether the resulting ontology can drive measurable learning gains. The core idea is schema co-design: the JSON schema constraining LLM output is the OWL T-box of the target ontology, so extracted records are directly populatable and no alignment step is needed; a literal-presence filter rejects entities absent from the source text before commit, the HermiT reasoner verifies consistency, and Kazakh, Russian and English labels are generated in a single follow-up call. The pipeline (Python 3.9, OWLready2) was benchmarked on 90 Kazakh paragraphs across GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Pro, and the resulting adaptive textbook was evaluated quasi-experimentally with 65 Grade 6 students (control n = 32, experimental n = 33) in two Astana schools over 16 weeks. Of 312 source chunks, 271 (86.9%) survived the full validation chain, yielding 1,847 OWL individuals, 2,931 object-property assertions and 6,512 data-property annotations across 47 classes; the literal-presence filter intercepted 5.2% of validated responses and the reasoner a further 1.1%. Extraction F1 reached 0.89 (GPT-4o), 0.87 (Claude) and 0.86 (Gemini), with hallucination rates of 4.9–8.3%; the one-time corpus build cost USD 3.47–9.64, with zero marginal LLM cost per learner. The experimental group outperformed controls on task accuracy (+19.4 points, d = 2.30), repeated errors (−53.6%, d = 1.85) and sessions to mastery (−34.3%, d = 1.50), all p 0.001 under Bonferroni correction. The novelty lies in making the ontology T-box itself the extraction schema, combined with pre-commit literal grounding, validated in a real low-resource classroom deployment.