Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ILMU USHULUDDIN Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir
Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta
Religion Education Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TAFSĪR TAHLĪLĪ (INTERPRETASI ANALITIS) QS. AL-FURQĀN [25]: 1-11 Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'`an dan Tafsir Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : IAIN Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/revelatia.v2i1.4488

Abstract

This paper examines the various interpretations of the tafsir scholars of surah al-Furqān. In the study of tafseer ('ulūm al-Qur'ān) there are several methods or ways of examining the contents of the al-Qur'an such as the Ijmali, Tahlīlī, Mauḍu'ī and muqaran methods. This study is focused on the interpretation of the tafsir scholars of surah al-Furqān [25]: 1-11 with the Tahlīlī Tafsir method approach. The author uses a literature study (Library Research) so that he finds findings on the interpretation of surah al-Furqān that the content in surah al-Furqān explains about monotheism towards Allah and Allah hates those who associate him (infidels). Keyword: Tafseer Tahlīlī, interpretations, Surah al-Furqān
Reassessing Al-Suyūṭī’s Claim of Tawqīfiyyah in Surah Naming: A Critical Analysis of Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān Eva Nugraha; Sahroni; Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/refleksi.v24.i1.49025

Abstract

This study critically examines al-Suyūṭī’s claim that all surah names in the Qur’an are tawqīfī, a theme that has received limited scholarly attention. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this article classifies al-Suyūṭī’s arguments in Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān and evaluates them based on the presence or absence of reliable prophetic or companion-based reports. The primary source for this research is Al-Itqān, supported by secondary literature from contemporary studies on Qur’anic sciences. The findings show that al-Suyūṭī’s arguments can be divided into two major categories: surah names supported by authentic hadith, and those derived from scholarly usage without strong textual basis. This study argues that al-Suyūṭī’s assertion of tawqīfiyyah is not fully supported by his own evidence, indicating inconsistencies in his methodological approach. The research contributes to Qur’anic studies by offering a more nuanced understanding of the historical development of surah naming and highlighting the interplay between revelation-based and ijtihād-based nomenclature.
FROM LIVING TRADITION TO TRANSMITTED AUTHORITY: AL-SUNNAH BEFORE AND AFTER AL-SHAFIʿĪ Kholik Ramdan Mahesa; Rifqi Muhammad Fatkhi; Atiyatul Ulya; Hilmy Firdausy
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2025
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.vi.53653

Abstract

The authority of hadith occupies a central position in Islamic intellectual history, yet its historical formation remains a subject of scholarly debate. Much of the existing literature tends to portray al-Shāfiʿī as the pivotal figure who established the epistemological foundation of hadith as an authoritative source of Islamic law. Such a perspective, however, risks obscuring the long historical process through which mechanisms of transmission, verification, documentation, and legal application of hadith had already developed prior to al-Shāfiʿī. This article addresses that gap by examining the transformation of hadith authority from the generation of the Companions to the emergence of al-Shāfiʿī’s legal theory. Employing an intellectual-historical approach, the study reconstructs the continuity and transformation of hadith authority through an analysis of early transmission practices, the development of scholarly networks among the tābiʿūn, the codification movement of the second century Hijrī, and the epistemological reformulation advanced by al-Shāfiʿī. The study argues that the authority of hadith was neither suddenly created nor exclusively dependent upon al-Shāfiʿī’s intervention. Rather, it emerged through a cumulative process involving verification practices (al-tathabbut), transmission networks, scholarly learning circles, and systematic documentation that had evolved since the earliest Muslim generations. Nevertheless, before al-Shāfiʿī, hadith functioned alongside other normative authorities, including communal practice, companion precedents, and juristic reasoning. The article demonstrates that al-Shāfiʿī’s principal contribution was not the creation of hadith authority, but the systematization and canonization of a new epistemological framework that identified authentic prophetic reports as the primary representation of the Sunnah and the principal criterion of legal legitimacy. Consequently, the transformation associated with al-Shāfiʿī is best understood as a shift from a model of living sunnah grounded in communal practice toward a model of transmitted sunnah grounded in authenticated transmission.
Co-Authors Eva Nugraha Hilmy Firdausy Rifqi Muhammad Fatkhi Sahroni Ulya, Atiyatul