Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman qolamuna : Jurnal studi islam Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Arif Dika Prasetya
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan dan Internet dalam Studi Islam: Telaah Kritis Terhadap Tesis Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an UIN Jakarta dan PTIQ Jakarta Arif Dika Prasetya
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM BANI FATTAH (IAIBAFA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/tafaqquh.v14i1.4528

Abstract

Transformasi digital yang berlangsung secara akseleratif dalam ekosistem akademik kontemporer telah menghadirkan pergeseran dalam cara peneliti mengakses, mengelola, dan mensintesiskan sumber-sumber ilmiah, termasuk dalam ranah studi keislaman di Indonesia. Metode penelitian kepustakaan dan pemanfaatan internet kini menempati posisi strategis sebagai fondasi epistemologis dalam menghasilkan karya akademik yang berbobot dan komprehensif. Paper ini bertujuan menelaah secara kritis konsep metode penelitian kepustakaan dan pemanfaatan internet, sekaligus mengkaji implementasinya secara komparatif dalam dua tesis bertema hermeneutika Al-Qur'an dari Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta dan Institut PTIQ Jakarta. Metode yang digunakan adalah telaah kritis komparatif berbasis kajian literatur terhadap kedua tesis tersebut secara sistematis. Temuan kajian menunjukkan bahwa kedua tesis mengimplementasikan metode kepustakaan dengan kadar eksplisitas metodologis yang berbeda secara signifikan, dan keduanya belum menyertakan refleksi kritis yang memadai atas pemanfaatan internet dalam proses penelitian. Implikasi temuan ini menegaskan urgensi peningkatan standar metodologis penelitian kepustakaan di perguruan tinggi Islam Indonesia secara sistematis dan berkelanjutan.
Digitalisasi Tabayyun Ethics 2.0: Revitalisasi Nilai Qur’ani dalam Menangkal Hoaks di Era Transformasi Digital Farah Fadia Ferdayanti; Arif Dika Prasetya
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (August)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v6i3.728

Abstract

Digital transformation has changed the patterns of social communication while simultaneously accelerating the spread of information in the public sphere. On the other hand, technological advancement has also triggered an increase in the spread of hoaxes, which potentially cause social unrest, conflict, and a decline in public trust in information. This study aims to examine the value of tabayyun in the Qur’an as an ethical foundation for addressing the spread of hoaxes in the digital era and to formulate the concept of Digital Tabayyun Ethics (DTE) 2.0 as a model of media ethics based on Qur’anic values. This research employs a qualitative method using a library research approach. Primary data sources are derived from the Qur’an and classical and contemporary tafsir (Qur’anic exegesis), particularly the interpretation of QS Al-Hujurat verse 6. Meanwhile, secondary sources include books, articles, academic journals, and other relevant documents related to digital literacy and information ethics. The data were analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method through interpretation of the verse, examination of its socio-historical context, and its relevance to contemporary digital information dynamics. The results show that the concept of tabayyun has strong relevance as a principle of information verification in addressing hoaxes. Through the development of Digital Tabayyun Ethics (DTE) 2.0, the value of tabayyun is actualized into four main principles: verification before viral, validation of information, accountability of digital speech, and empathy in communication. These principles form a Qur’anic digital ethics framework that emphasizes honesty, responsibility, and prudence in disseminating information in the era of digital transformation
INTERFAITH MARRIAGE IN THE PERSPECTIVES OF FOUR SUNNI MADHHABS AND FAMILY LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND JORDAN Ummu Lathifah Balqis; Arif Dika Prasetya
Qolamuna : Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 12 No. 01 (2026): Juli 2026
Publisher : STIS MIFTAHUL ULUM LUMAJANG PRESS (STISMU PRESS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55120/qolamuna.v12i01.2754

Abstract

Interfaith marriage remains a highly debated issue in Islamic law and contemporary family law. This study aims to analyze the perspectives of the four Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence on interfaith marriage, compare the legal regulations governing interfaith marriage in Indonesia and Jordan, and examine the relationship between classical Islamic legal doctrines and the positive laws implemented in both countries. This research employs a normative legal method using a comparative approach and library research. The data were collected from classical fiqh literature of the four sunni schools, statutory regulations, and relevant scholarly works. The findings reveal that all sunni schools of jurisprudence unanimously prohibit marriages between muslim women and non-muslim men. However, they differ regarding the extent to which muslim men may marry women from the ahl al-kitab (People of the Book). In terms of positive law, both Indonesia and Jordan regard religion as a fundamental basis for the legal validity of marriage, yet they adopt different regulatory models. Indonesia applies a pluralistic legal system in which marriage regulations result from the interaction between state law, religious law, and population administration policies. In contrast, Jordan directly incorporates Islamic family law throughthe Jordanian Personal Status Law, which is strongly influenced by the Hanafi school of jurisprudence. This study finds that the relationship between fiqh and positive law in Jordan is direct and integrative, whereas in Indonesia it is characterized by a compromise-oriented and accommodative approach through negotiations among fiqh norms, national legal pluralism, and state administrative policies. Keywords: interfaith marriage; four Sunni madhhabs; family law; Inonesia; Jordan.
Co-Authors Farah Fadia Ferdayanti Ummu Lathifah Balqis