Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Al Hakam: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law and Gender Issues
Mohammad Hendy Musthofa
UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
DIVERGENSI PERAN MEDIATOR DAN ADVOKAT DALAM MEDIASI PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA: DIVERGENCE OF THE ROLES OF MEDIATORS AND ADVOCATES IN DIVORCE MEDIATION IN RELIGIOUS COURTS Mohammad Hendy Musthofa
Al Hakam : The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law and Gender Issues Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Al Hakam
Publisher : Study Program of Islamic Family Law, Syari'ah Faculty, University of Al-Hikmah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35896/551t6x67

Abstract

Mediasi merupakan tahapan wajib dalam proses perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Mediasi memiliki peran penting dalam menyelesaikan perkara perceraian dan membantu pasangan yang berniat bercerai untuk mengurungkan niatnya. Dalam praktiknya, mediator sebagai penengah yang membantu komunikasi sering mengalami kendala, tidak hanya dari para pihak yang sudah tidak mau rujuk, tetapi juga dari pengaruh advokat sehingga mediasi kerap menjadi buntu. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui penelitian lapangan dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa observasi langsung, wawancara mendalam, focus group discussion, dan dokumentasi di Pengadilan Agama Kota Kediri. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran mediator sesuai PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 adalah memfasilitasi dan mencari penyelesaian terbaik bagi pihak yang bersengketa. Advokat sebagai wakil klien bertugas mempertahankan hak dan kepentingan kliennya, tujuan yang tidak selalu selaras dengan upaya mediator dalam mempertahankan perkawinan. Tingkat keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kota Kediri menunjukkan tren peningkatan yang signifikan, dari 15% pada tahun 2022 menjadi 40% pada tahun 2024, meskipun masih terdapat ruang perbaikan yang cukup besar.
HARMONISASI HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF DALAM PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN AKIBAT KEHAMILAN DI LUAR NIKAH Mohammad Hendy Musthofa; Muhammad Faiq
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): Oktober 2026
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/szc0jd26

Abstract

The phenomenon of premarital pregnancy presents complex legal challenges in Indonesia, particularly in marriage registration at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA). This article examines the harmonization of Islamic law and positive law, particularly in the dimensions of Islamic legal legislation and the practice of registering marriages resulting from premarital pregnancies. Using a normative-juridical and conceptual approach, this study analyzes the perspectives of four main schools of thought (madhhab) (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali), the provisions of Article 53 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. The results of the study indicate significant normative tensions, particularly on the issue of child lineage, between classical fiqh doctrine and contemporary Indonesian positive law. This article recommends a dialogical-epistemological harmonization model based on the maqashid sharia, which views fiqh munakahat and positive law as equal epistemological partners in an ongoing dialogue, with the protection of children, women, and legal certainty as top priorities. Implications for the reform of the KHI and the operational procedures of the KUA are also discussed.
DIVERGENCE OF THE ROLES OF MEDIATORS AND ADVOCATES IN DIVORCE MEDIATION IN RELIGIOUS COURTS Mohammad Hendy Musthofa
Al Hakam : The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law and Gender Issues Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Al Hakam
Publisher : Study Program of Islamic Family Law, Syari'ah Faculty, University of Al-Hikmah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35896/alhakam.v6i1.1347

Abstract

Mediation is a mandatory stage in divorce proceedings at the Religious Court. It plays a crucial role in resolving divorce cases and potentially dissuading couples from proceeding with separation. In practice, the mediator who acts as a neutral facilitator frequently encounters obstacles not only from the parties themselves who are determined to divorce, but also from the influence of advocates who accompany their clients, often causing the mediation process to reach an impasse. This research employs a qualitative approach through field research, with data collected via direct observation, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and documentation at the Religious Court of Kediri City. The findings reveal that mediators, in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016, are responsible for facilitating and seeking the best resolution for the disputing parties. Advocates, appointed by the parties, are empowered to represent their clients in protecting their rights and interests objectives that do not always align with the goal of preserving the marriage as pursued by mediators. The mediation success rate at the Religious Court of Kediri City showed a significant upward trend, from 15% in 2022 to 40% in 2024, though considerable room for improvement remains.
Co-Authors Muhammad Faiq