Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Ni luh Kadek Winda Mahartini
Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE BERBANTUAN PERMAINAN TRADISIONAL GULI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS V SEKOLAH DASAR DI GUGUS VI KECAMATAN SUKASADA Ni luh Kadek Winda Mahartini; I Made Suweta; Ni Putu Candra Prastya Dewi
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 2, Juni 2026 Publish
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.47990

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the Think Pair Share learning model assisted by the traditional marble game on the mathematical numeracy skills of fifth-grade elementary school students. This study implemented a quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design involving an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received treatment through the TPS learning model assisted by the traditional marble game, while the control group applied conventional learning methods. The research instrument consisted of tests administered during the pretest and posttest to measure students’ numeracy skills. The findings revealed that the average pretest score of the experimental group was 58.81 and increased to 88.66 in the posttest, while the average posttest score of the control group was 69.12. The results of the hypothesis testing indicated that the Sig. (2-tailed) value was 0.000 < 0.05, showing a significant effect of the TPS learning model assisted by the traditional marble game on students’ numeracy skills. In addition, the N-gain calculation results showed that the experimental group obtained a score of 0.72 (high classification), whereas the control group obtained a score of 0.34 (moderate classification).
Co-Authors I Made Suweta Ni Putu Candra Prastya Dewi