Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora Ameena Journal
Wike Sundari
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekayasa Hukum (Fraus Legis) Dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama: Studi Komparatif Pengakuan Hukum Antara Singapura Dan Indonesia Pasca Sema No 2 Tahun 2023 Wike Sundari; Sukiati; Iwan
Ameena Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Ameena Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Madinah Al-Aziziyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63732/aij.v4i2.258

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of interfaith marriages involving Indonesian citizens (WNI) conducted in Singapore as a response to national legal restrictions following the enactment of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023. The central issue lies in the conflict between the principle of lex loci celebrationis, which recognizes the formal validity of marriages performed in Singapore, and lex patriae, which requires compliance with material conditions—specifically religious uniformity for Indonesian citizens. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this research aims to analyze the differing roles of religious and civil law in both countries and their legal implications.The findings reveal a fundamental divergence: Indonesia adopts a religious-formalistic system, where religious law constitutes an essential requirement for marital validity, whereas Singapore applies a secular-pragmatic system under the Women’s Charter, separating civil authority from religious doctrine. Marriages conducted by Indonesian citizens in Singapore are considered a form of legal evasion (fraus legis), as they involve an intention to circumvent national law (animus evadendi). SEMA No. 2 of 2023 reinforces the refusal to register such marriages on the grounds of public policy derived from Pancasila values. Consequently, this gives rise to limping marriages, in which couples lack full legal recognition in Indonesia, particularly regarding marital property and inheritance rights. The most significant impact affects children born from such unions, who are legally classified as children born out of wedlock, with limited civil rights and more complex administrative procedures. This study concludes that Indonesia’s current legal policy prioritizes theological legal certainty over the protection of citizens’ civil rights within a global context.
Penipuan Status Lajang Suami sebagai Bentuk Dharar dan Implikasinya terhadap Gugatan Cerai Istri: Analisis Kompilasi Hukum Islam Wike Sundari; Heri Firmansyah
Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Takuana (January-March)
Publisher : MAN 4 Kota Pekanbaru

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56113/takuana.v4i4.340

Abstract

Marriage in Islam is a mitsaqan ghalizhan grounded in honesty and transparency. However, some husbands fraudulently claim to be “single” to conceal an existing marriage, facilitate siri marriages, or evade responsibilities. This study examines the legal construction of such fraud through the concepts of dharar and dhirar, and its implications for a wife’s divorce claim under the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes relevant legal norms and Islamic legal principles through a literature review. The findings indicate that false single-status claims are not merely administrative violations, but constitute dharar ma‘nawi (psychological and moral harm) that undermines marital integrity and violates the wife’s rights. In Islamic legal reasoning, this conduct falls under the maxim la dharar wa la dhirar. Juridically, it supports divorce claims through an expanded interpretation of Article 116 (f) and 116 (g) KHI.
Co-Authors Heri Firmansyah Iwan Sukiati Sukiati