Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Tiara Kansa Anjar Pratiwi
universitas islam negeri sunan gunung djati bandung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kajian Yuridis Normatif terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Platform Telegram dalam Pembajakan Film Berdasarkan Hukum Hak Cipta di Indonesia Gina Rahma; Tiara Kansa Anjar Pratiwi; Asfy Putri; Ikhwan Aulia Fatahillah
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20675827

Abstract

This study examines the legal liability of the Telegram platform for film piracy under Indonesian copyright law, addressing the persistent gap between existing legal norms and their enforcement in the digital environment.The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches, relying on secondary data derived from legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant literature. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s legal framework, including copyright and electronic transaction regulations, is substantively comprehensive in protecting the economic rights of creators and regulating digital platforms. However, enforcement remains ineffective due to technological complexities, limited monitoring capabilities, weak deterrent effects, and low public awareness. The study further reveals that Telegram, while not the primary perpetrator, may bear civil liability in the form of secondary liability if negligence in preventing or addressing infringing content is proven, although criminal liability is difficult to establish without evidence of intent. 
Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Melalui PTUN dan Ombudsman Asti Anindya Khoerunisa; Tiara Kansa Anjar Pratiwi; Firman Khaidar Ahmad Dimyati; Aksa Maraditia
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20676296

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences between the functions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Ombudsman in resolving State Administrative disputes, examine the scope of authority of both institutions, and assess their effectiveness in providing legal protection to the public. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, juridical, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that PTUN functions as a judicial institution that resolves State Administrative disputes through litigation mechanisms and issues legally binding and enforceable decisions. In contrast, the Ombudsman serves as a public service supervisory institution that focuses on preventing and addressing maladministration through non-litigation mechanisms, including complaint examination, investigation, mediation, and the issuance of recommendations. In terms of effectiveness, PTUN is more effective in ensuring legal certainty and annulling unlawful State Administrative Decisions, whereas the Ombudsman is more effective in addressing maladministration in public services due to its faster, simpler, and cost-free procedures. These findings demonstrate that both institutions play complementary roles in strengthening legal protection and promoting good governance in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Aksa Maraditia Asfy Putri Asti Anindya Khoerunisa Firman Khaidar Ahmad Dimyati Gina Rahma Ikhwan Aulia Fatahillah