Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Asti Anindya Khoerunisa
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Melalui PTUN dan Ombudsman Asti Anindya Khoerunisa; Tiara Kansa Anjar Pratiwi; Firman Khaidar Ahmad Dimyati; Aksa Maraditia
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20676296

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences between the functions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Ombudsman in resolving State Administrative disputes, examine the scope of authority of both institutions, and assess their effectiveness in providing legal protection to the public. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, juridical, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that PTUN functions as a judicial institution that resolves State Administrative disputes through litigation mechanisms and issues legally binding and enforceable decisions. In contrast, the Ombudsman serves as a public service supervisory institution that focuses on preventing and addressing maladministration through non-litigation mechanisms, including complaint examination, investigation, mediation, and the issuance of recommendations. In terms of effectiveness, PTUN is more effective in ensuring legal certainty and annulling unlawful State Administrative Decisions, whereas the Ombudsman is more effective in addressing maladministration in public services due to its faster, simpler, and cost-free procedures. These findings demonstrate that both institutions play complementary roles in strengthening legal protection and promoting good governance in Indonesia.
Kajian Yuridis Normatif atas Penyebaran Ulang Konten Berbayar Weverse sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Afwany Hisaaby; Asti Anindya Khoerunisa; Salsabila Malika Besrolia; Ikhwan Aulia Fatahillah
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 2 No 1 (2026): : September: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/y9r73a57

Abstract

The rapid expansion of membership-based digital platforms, particularly Weverse, has increased the unauthorized redistribution of paid content, raising significant copyright issues in Indonesia's digital ecosystem. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through library research based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings demonstrate that unauthorized redistribution of paid Weverse content through screen recording, screenshots, downloads, and dissemination via social media constitutes copyright infringement by violating the economic rights of copyright holders under Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, particularly concerning reproduction, distribution, and public communication without authorization. Although Indonesian copyright law provides preventive and repressive legal protection, its implementation remains constrained by evidentiary difficulties, cross-platform dissemination, limited regulatory adaptation to digital membership services, and insufficient public legal awareness. The study recommends strengthening adaptive legal enforcement, platform accountability, and copyright literacy to improve the protection of exclusive digital content in the evolving digital environment.
Co-Authors Afwany Hisaaby Aksa Maraditia Firman Khaidar Ahmad Dimyati Ikhwan Aulia Fatahillah Salsabila Malika Besrolia Tiara Kansa Anjar Pratiwi