Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law
Dulsukmi Kasim
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dinamika Pemberlakuan Hukum Islam di Indonesia (Jejak, Produk, dan Potensi Pengembangannya) Dulsukmi Kasim; Muhammad Ghazali Rahman
Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Education and Islamic Studies
Publisher : STAI DDI Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55623/au.v6i1.389

Abstract

Dinamika pemberlakuan hukum Islam di Indonesia merupakan fenomena yang terus berkembang dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan masyarakat dan sistem hukum nasional. Permasalahan utama dalam kajian ini adalah bagaimana hukum Islam diberlakukan dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, tantangan yang dihadapi dalam implementasinya, serta potensi pengembangannya di masa depan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis jejak historis pemberlakuan hukum Islam di Indonesia, mengidentifikasi produk hukum Islam yang telah diakomodasi dalam regulasi nasional, serta menggali potensi pengembangan hukum Islam dalam sistem hukum modern. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis deskriptif dan historis. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi literatur terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, serta kajian akademik terkait hukum Islam di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum Islam telah memiliki peran signifikan dalam sistem hukum nasional, terutama dalam bidang hukum keluarga, perbankan syariah, dan ekonomi Islam. Meskipun demikian, masih terdapat berbagai tantangan dalam harmonisasi hukum Islam dengan hukum positif, termasuk perbedaan pandangan di antara pemangku kepentingan serta faktor sosial-politik yang mempengaruhi proses legislasi.
When Clerical Errors Become Court Cases: Administrative Justice and the Judicialization of Marriage Registration in Indonesia Rois Fadzi Ahmad Ravi; Rizal Darwis; Dulsukmi Kasim; Muhammad Yusril Al Usmani
Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 5, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajifl.v5i2.3930

Abstract

This article analyzes the juridical and socio-legal implications of the judicialization of marriage biodata correction under the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs (PMA) Number 30 of 2024 in Indonesia. The regulation requires that all amendments to marital biodata be resolved through judicial determination, shifting corrective authority from the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) to the Religious Courts. This policy change raises concerns regarding administrative justice, public service efficiency, and access to justice in family law administration. Using a combined normative juridical and socio-legal approach, the study examines the evolution of marriage registration regulations from PMA No. 11 of 2007 to PMA No. 30 of 2024. It analyzes empirical data from biodata amendment cases adjudicated by the Religious Court of Suwawa between January and October 2025. The findings reveal a non-linear regulatory trajectory marked by alternating phases of administrative flexibility and judicial centralization, as well as persistent ambiguity in distinguishing clerical corrections from substantive amendments. Empirically, most court applications involve minor typographical errors previously resolvable administratively. The article argues that this condition reflects over-judicialization of administrative corrections. It concludes that technically non-substantive biodata corrections should be reintegrated into the administrative authority of the KUA through a structured and accountable administrative self-correction mechanism to promote proportionality, efficiency, and public service justice.
Co-Authors Muhammad Yusril Al Usmani Muhammad Ghazali Rahman Rizal Darwis Rois Fadzi Ahmad Ravi