Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Peran Blockchain dalam Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Analisis Bibliometrik Desiana Rachmawati; Dwike Rachmaningtyas; Rischa Inung Fauziah; Fandi Galang Wicaksana
Balance : Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Balance : Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32502/balance.v11i1.1640

Abstract

This study maps the development and research direction of blockchain applications in public sector accounting using a bibliometric approach. A total of 58 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2017 and 2025 were analyzed using keyword co-occurrence and visualized through VOSviewer. The findings indicate a significant increase in publications, particularly during 2021–2025, reflecting growing academic interest. Computer science dominates the field, followed by business, management, and accounting, highlighting its multidisciplinary nature. Citation analysis reveals a mix of highly influential foundational studies and emerging recent works. However, collaboration networks among authors, institutions, and countries remain limited and not yet globally integrated. Keyword co-occurrence analysis shows blockchain as the central theme, with a shift from technical aspects toward applications in accounting, auditing, and governance. Overall, this research confirms that blockchain studies in the public sector are in a growth and maturation phase with substantial future potential.
Mekanisme Tata Kelola Perusahaan dan Financial Distress: Bukti Empiris pada Perbankan Indonesia Richatul Jannah; Rischa Inung Fauziah; Andre Yulian Hidayat; Tiara Saharani Fatimah; Aulia Dewi Puspita
Jibaku: Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Ngudi Waluyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35473/jibaku.v6i2.5124

Abstract

The achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires companies to maintain financial integrity as part of their efforts to ensure business sustainability, particularly in the banking sector, which is characterized by high complexity and risk. Weak financial integrity may increase the potential for fraud and financial distress. Therefore, the implementation of effective corporate governance mechanisms through managerial ownership, internal audit, and whistleblowing systems is essential as a means of detecting and preventing fraud while maintaining financial stability. This study examines the effect of managerial ownership, internal audit, and whistleblowing systems on financial distress, which serves as a proxy for fraud risk and corporate financial integrity. Using an exploratory quantitative approach, this study analyzes banking sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2019–2023 period. A total of 33 observations were analyzed using panel data regression with the Random Effect Model (REM). The findings show that the whistleblowing system significantly reduces the risk of financial distress. In contrast, managerial ownership and internal audit do not show statistically significant effects, although the direction of their relationships is consistent with corporate governance theory. These findings indicate that strengthening the whistleblowing system is important for banking companies to reduce the risk of financial distress and maintain financial integrity.   Abstrak Pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) menuntut perusahaan untuk menjaga integritas keuangan sebagai bagian dari upaya mewujudkan keberlanjutan usaha, khususnya pada sektor perbankan yang memiliki tingkat kompleksitas dan risiko yang tinggi. Lemahnya integritas keuangan dapat meningkatkan potensi terjadinya fraud dan kesulitan keuangan (financial distress). Oleh karena itu, penerapan mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan yang efektif melalui kepemilikan manajerial, audit internal, dan whistleblowing system menjadi penting sebagai sarana deteksi dan pencegahan fraud guna menjaga stabilitas keuangan. Studi ini meneliti dampak kepemilikan manajerial, audit internal, dan whistleblowing system terhadap financial distress, yang berfungsi sebagai proksi untuk risiko fraud dan integritas keuangan perusahaan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksploratif, studi ini menganalisis perusahaan-perusahaan sektor perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (IDX) selama periode 2019–2023. Sebanyak 33 unit observasi dianalisis menggunakan regresi data panel dengan Random Effect Model (REM). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa whistleblowing system secara signifikan mengurangi risiko financial distress. Sebaliknya, kepemilikan manajerial dan audit internal tidak menunjukkan efek yang signifikan secara statistik, meskipun hubungan arahnya selaras dengan teori tata kelola perusahaan. Temuan ini menunjukkan penguatan whistleblowing system penting dilakukan oleh perusahaan perbankan untuk menekan risiko financial distress dan menjaga integritas keuangan.  
Performance-Based Budgeting and Regional Financial Performance: The Role of Productive Expenditure and Accountability Rischa Inung Fauziah; Fandi Galang Wicaksana; Desiana Rachmawati; Richatul Jannah; Kurniana Sandra Lungit
Al Dzahab Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Al Dzahab: Journal of Economics, Management, Business and Accounting
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/dhb.v7i1.5870

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the relationship between Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB) and regional financial performance, with a particular focus on the role of productive expenditure and accountability. Design/Methodology/Approach: This research adopts a quantitative approach using panel data from 33 local governments in Central Java Province over the period 2022–2024, resulting in 99 observations. Productive expenditure is used as a proxy for outcome-oriented budget allocation, while accountability is measured using the Government Institution Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) score. Data were analyzed using panel regression techniques. Findings: The results reveal that productive expenditure has a significant negative effect on regional financial performance, indicating that increased allocation toward capital or outcome-based spending does not necessarily improve financial outcomes due to inefficiencies in budget execution, particularly in procurement processes. In contrast, accountability, as proxied by SAKIP scores, does not show a significant effect, suggesting that accountability practices remain largely procedural rather than performance-driven. Additionally, government size as a control variable has a significant positive impact on financial performance. Research Implications: These findings highlight the need for local governments to strengthen managerial capacity, improve budget execution mechanisms, and enhance substantive accountability practices to ensure that performance-based budgeting achieves its intended outcomes.