Agus Riwanto
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 33/PUU-XIII/2015 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PEMBATASAN POLITIK DINASTI PADA PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH Septya hanung surya dewi; Agus Riwanto
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 7, No 1: April
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v7i1.51044

Abstract

This thesis  examines and describes effect of The Constitutional Court Decision Verdict No. 33/PUU-XIII/2015 concerning the restiction of political dynasty on regional chief election and whether the verdict has been appreciate with Constitution of Indonesia, UUD NRI 1945.This research is normative legal research which is descriptive. The result of this research shows that 1) the effect after constitonal court verdict No. 33/PUU-XIII/2015 resulted in article 7 letter r of Law Number 8 of 2015 having no binding legal force and having an impact of implementing regulating under it, as well as creating a conflict of interest. The implemention of regional chief election if there is a conflict of interest resulting in unequal competition, affect the accountability of local elections, political dynasty, and political corruption. However, if there are no conflict of interest, the implementation of local election run smoothly with a strict supervison of all instrumen. 2) the constitutional court verdict No. 33/PUU-XIII/2015  is not according with mandate of Constitution of Indonesia, UUD NRI 1945 Article 28J paragraph (2) and Article 18 paragraph (4) are related to improving the quality of democracy in regional elections.  
Constitutional Regression through Jurisprudential Repetition in the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Recall Doctrine Sultoni Fikri; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Agus Riwanto; Imranullah Akhtar
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Contemporary Legal Responses to Technological, Economic, and Social Change
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v11i1.40342

Abstract

This study examines the implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 199/PUU-XXIII/2025, which affirms the constitutionality of the interim replacement (Pergantian Antarwaktu/PAW) of members of the House of Representatives (DPR) at the initiative of political parties. It focuses on whether the Court’s interpretation of Article 22E paragraph (3) of UUD NRI 1945 is consistent with the principle of popular sovereignty and whether party-initiated recall remains constitutionally justified within an open-list proportional electoral system based on candidates’ highest vote totals. This study employs a legal research methodology using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, examining the UUD NRI 1945, Law Number 17 of 2014, Law Number 2 of 2011, Law Number 7 of 2017, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The study argues that Decision No. 199/PUU-XXIII/2025 reinforces party sovereignty by relying on and repeating the reasoning of Decision No. 38/PUU-VIII/2010 without adequately rethinking the constitutional implications of the contemporary electoral system. Such jurisprudential repetition shifts control over the representative mandate from voters to political parties, weakens vertical accountability to constituents, and undermines the legitimacy of individual votes. The decision therefore risks transforming Indonesian representative democracy from a people-centered model into a party-centered electoral model, in which popular sovereignty is formally preserved but substantively weakened