Zainal Arifin
STAIA Syubbanul Wathon Magelang, Indonesia;

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Decision No. 568/Pdt.G/2020 on Arrears of Maintenance in a Divorce Lawsuit from the Perspective of Islamic Law Zainal Arifin; Puput Alifah; Nashih Muhammad; Sumarjoko
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2025: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v3i2.605

Abstract

This study examines the Decision of the Temanggung Religious Court No. 568/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tmg concerning arrears of maintenance in a divorce lawsuit, which arises from household problems caused by the husband’s neglect of maintenance obligations during a period of living separately. Economic difficulties constitute the dominant factor triggering marital conflict and ultimately leading to divorce, thereby giving rise to the wife’s claim for arrears of maintenance. This research aims to analyze the judges’ legal considerations in deciding the case and to assess their conformity with the principles of Islamic law. The research method employed is a normative–juridical approach, with data collected through library research on court decisions, statutory regulations, the Compilation of Islamic Law, legal doctrines, and relevant Islamic legal literature. Data analysis is conducted using a descriptive–qualitative method by examining legal norms and judicial considerations.The findings indicate that maintenance is positioned as a husband’s obligation that does not lapse despite living separately, and failure to fulfill this obligation results in legal consequences in the form of arrears of maintenance that may be claimed by the wife. This decision is in line with the principles of justice in Islamic law and strengthens the protection of the wife’s economic rights. This study is expected to contribute to the development of Islamic family law studies and to increase public awareness of the importance of maintenance responsibilities within the household
The Chronicle of the Prohibition of Marriage in the Month of Suro: A Historical, Philosophical, and Community Education Analysis Eka Mahargiani; Faiqqotus Sakdiyah; Sumarjoko Sumarjoko; Zainal Arifin
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i1.1237

Abstract

The prohibition of marriage during the month of Suro remains a widely observed tradition in Javanese society, reflecting the dynamic interaction between local cultural practices and Islamic values, particularly in relation to Javanese cosmology and the concept of the sacredness of time. This study aims to examine the historical development and philosophical significance of the tradition of prohibiting marriage during the month of Suro from the perspectives of Javanese culture and Islamic law. The research employs a qualitative library research method using historical and philosophical approaches. Data were collected from historical literature, studies on Javanese culture, scholarly journal articles, and previous research, and were analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that this tradition constitutes a form of cultural heritage shaped through a long historical process, rooted in pre-Islamic cosmological beliefs and subsequently developed through the acculturation of Hindu-Buddhist and Islamic traditions. Philosophically, the tradition embodies values of prudence, respect for ancestors, and the preservation of harmony between human beings, nature, and the spiritual realm. Over time, its function has shifted from a binding social norm to a cultural symbol and an expression of local wisdom. From the perspective of Islamic law, there is no prohibition against marriage in any specific month. Therefore, this tradition may be regarded as a form of customary practice (ʿurf) that is acceptable as long as it does not contradict the principles of Islamic law.