Vina Fathira
Universitas Persada Bunda Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EFFECTIVENESS OF AI-INTEGRATED COLLABORATIVE WRITING AMONG UNIVERSITY EFL STUDENTS IN WRITING FLUENCY M. Fadhly Farhy Abbas; Vina Fathira; Satria Adi Pradana
English Review: Journal of English Education Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : University of Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/englishreview.v14i2.200

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the effectiveness of AI-integrated collaborative writing on writing fluency of EFL students in higher education. The method employed was quantitative with quasi- experimental design. There were 40 students divided into experimental and control groups. Technique of collecting data was writing tests before and after the treatment. The technique of analyzing data used paired sample t-tests and independent sample t-tests for determining writing ability and comparisons between groups. The results showed that both groups experienced improvements in writing ability, but the experimental group using AI integration showed a more significant improvement. These findings revealed that the use of AI, such as ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly, and DeepL, can act as a digital scaffold that helps students develop ideas, improve grammar, and increase writing fluency more effectively. Practically, this study provides evidence that AI integration in collaborative learning can improve quality and efficiency of writing learning process in higher education. The findings also suggest that combining technological tools with collaborative strategies creates a more supportive and interactive learning environment for EFL students. Therefore, AI-integrated collaborative writing can be considered an innovative pedagogical approach to enhance writing fluency in higher education contexts.
Fostering Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy: Students’ Use of the Verb “Be” in English Sentences Gunaldi Masbiran; Vina Fathira; Lelly Zuyana Asril
EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Ling
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61672/eji.v10i1.3389

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ mastery of the verb be in various sentence forms and to evaluate the role of digital-based exercises in enhancing students’ critical thinking and digital literacy skills. The study employed a quantitative descriptive approach, with data collected through Google Forms from 12 EFL students. The research instrument consisted of multiple-choice questions, with 10 items each for positive sentences, negative sentences, and interrogative sentences. The results indicate that students are more proficient in forming positive sentences, while negative and interrogative sentences show higher error rates, particularly regarding subject-verb inversion and the use of not. Activities requiring students to explain their answer choices fostered the development of critical thinking skills, while the use of an online platform strengthened their digital literacy. The limitations of this study include a relatively small sample size and a focus on simple sentences. Future research is suggested to expand the sample, use more complex sentences, and explore the relationship between grammar mastery, critical thinking, and digital literacy in more authentic learning contexts.