Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Abdul Kodir Alhamdani
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Istri atas Penelantaran Nafkah: Integrasi Pendekatan Fikih dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Agus Jatnika; Mumu Fahmudin; Abdul Kodir Alhamdani
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2539

Abstract

Maintenance neglect is a fundamental marital violation and a primary factor in high divorce rates. Currently, normative clashes exist between the classical fiqh approach in the Compilation of Islamic Law, such as the nusyuz concept, and the absolute penal regime in the Elimination of Domestic Violence Act. Furthermore, wives forced to file for divorce lawsuits often face post-divorce financial injustice. This normative research aims to analyze the integration of fiqh and Indonesian positive law to provide comprehensive legal protection for wives. Utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches based on Maqashid al-Shari'ah, the findings highlight the urgency for a gender-neutral reconstruction of nusyuz that includes the husband's nusyuz. Criminal proceedings for economic neglect under the Domestic Violence Act must also be synergized with a restorative justice approach. In the courts, protection can be optimized through the application of judges’ ex officio rights based on Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2017 to secure post-divorce maintenance. The implication of this research demands national regulatory harmonization and the reformulation of court executory instruments to ensure the fulfillment of victims’ rights.
Konstruksi Dar’u al-Mafasid dalam Putusan Hakim pada Perkara Perceraian Akibat Perselisihan Terus Menerus Ahmad Ihksaludin; Yudi Wahyudin; Mumu Fahmudin; Abdul Kodir Alhamdani; Mohammad Husni Mubarok
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.2638

Abstract

The high rate of divorce due to continuous disputes in Religious Courts has prompted judges to use the jurisprudential maxim dar'u al-mafasid muqaddamun 'ala jalb al-mashalih as the normative basis for their legal considerations. However, the application of this maxim in judicial practice is often carried out disproportionately and without measurable standards, potentially producing decisions that are inconsistent with the objectives of Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the construction of the dar'u al-mafasid maxim in judges' decisions on divorce cases due to continuous disputes, evaluate its proportionality from the perspective of maqasid al-syari'ah, identify its construction patterns, and formulate an ideal and measurable construction model. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, case, and philosophical-hermeneutic approaches. Legal materials were collected through documentation studies and analyzed qualitatively using content analysis, descriptive-analytical, comparative, and normative-evaluative techniques. The findings reveal that the construction of the dar'u al-mafasid maxim in judges' decisions is built through three stages: identification of mafsadat and maslahat, weighing (muwazanah) between them, and establishing priorities (awlawiyat); however, significant inconsistencies and disproportionality exist across various court levels. Three construction patterns were identified: fact-based, irreconcilability-based, and maqasid al-syari'ah-based. This study formulates an ideal construction model through five integrative stages: comprehensive fact verification, optimal reconciliation efforts, measurable mafsadat identification and assessment, proportional weighing integrating four dimensions of moderate jurisprudence, and maqasid al-syari'ah-based decision-making. This model is expected to serve as a guideline for Religious Court judges in producing substantively just decisions aligned with the objectives of Islamic law.
Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana terhadap Praktik Nikah Siri dan Poligami Tanpa Izin Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Muhamad Ramdhan; Abdul Kodir Alhamdani; Yudi Wahyudin; Mumu Fahmudin; Mohammad Husni Mubarok
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.2639

Abstract

The practice of unregistered marriage (nikah siri) and polygamy without court permission remains a persistent legal problem in Indonesia, causing serious consequences for the legal protection of women and children. This study aims to analyze the criminal law formulation policy against nikah siri and unauthorized polygamy practices based on Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new Criminal Code (KUHP), compare it with the formulation under the old Criminal Code, and evaluate its alignment with the objective of legal protection for women and children. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, analyzing primary and secondary legal materials qualitatively. The results reveal three main findings: first, the formulation policy under the old Criminal Code contains structural weaknesses, including the absence of explicit criminal sanctions in the Marriage Law, the complaint-based nature of the offense that limits prosecution, inconsistent interpretation of Article 279 among law enforcement officers, and the misapplication of criminal provisions against perpetrators of secret polygamy; second, Law Number 1 of 2023 brings significant reforms through a more comprehensive reformulation of marriage offenses, more precise elements of criminal acts, a more flexible sanction system, and the integration of restorative justice principles; third, the formulation policy still requires strengthening in terms of protecting the rights of women and children, as criminal approaches alone are insufficient without synergy with administrative policies and community empowerment. This study concludes that the criminal law formulation policy in the new Criminal Code must be understood as an instrument for achieving substantive justice oriented toward the protection of life, lineage, and property as required by the principles of maqashid syari'ah.
Dekonstruksi Makna Hifz al-Nasl di Era Kontemporer: Analisis Hukum Keluarga Islam terhadap Pilihan Childfree Abdul Rahman; Yudi Wahyudin; Mumu Fahmudin; Abdul Kodir Alhamdani; Halmi Abdul Halim
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v3i1.2640

Abstract

The childfree phenomenon the deliberate choice of married couples not to have children is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia and has sparked serious debate in Islamic family law discourse, particularly regarding the principle of hifz al-nasl (preservation of progeny) as one of the fundamental elements of maqashid al-syari'ah. This study aims to deconstruct the meaning of hifz al-nasl from classical and contemporary perspectives, analyze the legal status of the childfree choice within the framework of Islamic family law, and formulate a comprehensive and contextual legal construction. This research employs a normative legal research method using library research, Jasser Auda's contemporary maqashid al-syari'ah approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively through content analysis, descriptive-analytical, deconstructive-reconstructive, and comparative techniques. The findings reveal three key conclusions: first, the deconstruction of hifz al-nasl produces a more comprehensive understanding through Jasser Auda's reconstruction that expands hifz al-nasl into hifz al-usrah (family protection), shifting the orientation of progeny preservation beyond mere biological reproduction to encompass family quality and overall well-being; second, the typological analysis of childfree yields a graduated legal mapping: voluntarily childfree without valid religious justification is ruled makruh to haram, temporarily childfree is permissible as equivalent to tandzim al-nasl, and voluntarily childfree due to medical emergency may be permitted; third, legal reconstruction based on Jasser Auda's system approach produces a more just and relevant legal construction for Muslim couples in Indonesia. This research contributes to the development of contemporary Islamic family law discourse in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdul Rahman Agus Jatnika Ahmad Ihksaludin Halmi Abdul Halim Mohammad Husni Mubarok Muhamad Ramdhan Mumu Fahmudin Yudi Wahyudin