Sahril Sidik
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PENERAPAN ISTIHSAN (BI AL-MASLAHAH) DALAM KONSEP WASIAT WAJIBAH DI INDONESIA Elin Herlina; Sahril Sidik; Usep Saepullah
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/26m69m59

Abstract

This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the methodological construction of "Dual-Layered Istihsan" in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) as a response to the rigidity of standard qiyas jaliy which blocks the grandchildren’s rights (mahjub). Using a normative juridical approach with usul fiqh analysis, Previous studies on the inheritance rights of orphaned grandchildren tend to discuss Substitute Heirs and Mandatory Bequests separately or merely as positive legal policies. this study reveals a novelty that KHI does not merely apply a single form of istihsan, but rather establishes a Dual-Layered Protection Mechanism. First, Article 185 (Substitute Heirs) is positioned as the primary solution applying pure istihsan bi al-maslahah to grant full heir status. Second, Article 209 (Mandatory Bequest) functions as a safety net, representing a hybridization of istihsan bi al-nass and bi al-maslahah for relatives excluded from the first mechanism. This study concludes that the dialectic between these two articles proves that KHI prioritizes substantive justice (maqasid al-syari'ah) over classical legal formalism without dismantling the fundamental structure of fara'id
ANALISIS METODOLOGIS PERAN KAIDAH FIQIH DALAM INTERPRETASI HADIS AHKAM DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM Mohamad Sar'an; Sahril Sidik
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): July
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/nfmf9v84

Abstract

Hadith Ahkam (legal hadiths) are the second primary source in Islamic law, particularly in the field of Family Law (Ahwal Syakhsiyyah). However, understanding Hadith Ahkam cannot always be done literally, given the diversity of wording, context (asbab al-wurud), and potential ta'arudh (contradictions) between arguments. Fiqh principles (Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyyah), as general principles derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah, serve as a crucial methodological tool (manhaj) in the process of istinbath (derivation) and interpretation of law. This study aims to analyse the function and role of Fiqh Principles in understanding Hadith Ahkam and their implications for the establishment of contemporary Islamic Family Law. Using qualitative research methods through library research and the usul fiqh approach, this study found that Fiqh Rules such as Al-Masyaqqah Tajlib at-Taysir (Difficulty brings ease), Ad -Dhararu Yuzal (harm must be eliminated), and Al-'Adah Muhakkamah (customs can become law) function as instruments of tarjih (strengthening one argument over another), takhsis (specifying a general argument), and contextualisation. Its implementation in family law is evident in issues such as marriage guardianship (wali 'adhal), divorce rights, alimony, and child custody (hadhanah), where the application of these principles allows Islamic law to remain relevant, adaptive, and oriented towards public interest (maqasid al-syari'ah