Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies
Faiz Hidayatullah
Al-Azhar University
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Maqāṣid al-Qur'an sebagai Kerangka Etis untuk Mencapai Pilar Pembangunan Sosial dalam Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDGs) Ahmad Muchlishon; Nailil Farohah; Faiz Hidayatullah
Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Tarbiyatut Tholabah Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58518/alfurqan.v9i1.4736

Abstract

The increasing complexity of global social challenges has intensified the search for ethical frameworks capable of supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Although numerous studies have examined the relationship between Islam and sustainable development, limited attention has been given to the Maqāṣid al-Qur'an as a comprehensive ethical framework for advancing the social development pillar of the SDGs. This study aims to examine how the higher objectives of the Qur'an provide normative principles for achieving the five goals within the social development pillar of the SDGs. Employing a qualitative library research design, the study analyzes data derived from the Qur'an, Hadith, official SDG documents, statistical reports published by Statistics Indonesia (BPS), and relevant scholarly literature using thematic content analysis. The findings demonstrate that the Maqāṣid al-Qur'an constitutes a holistic ethical framework through three interrelated dimensions. First, social welfare is established as a theological obligation grounded in faith (īmān) and piety (taqwā), transforming poverty alleviation and social justice into religious responsibilities rather than merely development targets. Second, Islamic philanthropic instruments, particularly ZISWAF (zakat, infaq, ṣadaqah, and waqf), function as strategic institutional mechanisms for translating Qur'anic ethical values into sustainable social policies. Third, prophetic leadership provides the ethical governance necessary to ensure justice, accountability, and public welfare in implementing development programs. This study contributes to contemporary discussions on religion and sustainable development by conceptualizing the Maqāṣid al-Qur'an as an ethical framework that complements the global SDG agenda while offering normative guidance for socially just, inclusive, and sustainable development.
The Construction of Non-Naskh Reasoning in Tafsir At-Tanwir: Methodological Shifts and Juridical Challenges Akhlis Al Majid; Trisna Yudistira; Faiz Hidayatullah
QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/qist.v5i2.16908

Abstract

Purpose - The debate on intra-Qur'anic naskh has long been central to Qur'anic studies. While Muhammadiyah's Manhaj Tarjih formally acknowledges naskh as a hierarchical legal principle for resolving conflicting evidences (ta'āruḍ), Tafsir At-Tanwir appears to adopt a different interpretive orientation. This study examines the construction of non-naskh reasoning within Tafsir At-Tanwir and evaluates the consistency of its application across different thematic verses such as theological, historical, and legal verses.Design/methodology/approach - This study employs a qualitative library-based research design using content analysis and critical-comparative methods. Primary data are drawn from two Muhammadiyah institutional works—Tafsir At-Tanwir and Manhaj Tarjih Muhammadiyah—while classical works on naskh, and Qur'anic interpretation literature serve as supporting sources. The analysis compares interpretive strategies employed in different thematic contexts to identify underlying methodological patterns.Findings - The findings reveal a significant methodological dualism in Tafsir At-Tanwir. In theological and historical discussions, the commentary adopts a modernist-rationalist approach influenced by Muḥammad 'Abduh and Rasyīd Riḍā, consistently rejecting intra-Qur'anic naskh through various approaches ranging from semantic deconstruction and the logic of revelatory chronology to linguistic analysis. However, this methodological consistency weakens when addressing practical jurisprudential issues, particularly in verses concerning family law and social relations, such as bequests to relatives, the waiting period for widows, and instructions regarding the Ahlulkitab. In these instances, the commentary tends to accommodate classical scholarly consensus or adopt a silent stance.Research implications/limitations - This study is limited to the first two published volumes of Tafsir At-Tanwir. Future research should examine subsequent volumes upon their release to determine whether this methodological inconsistency persists as the commentary progresses. Comparative studies with other contemporary institutional commentaries are also recommended to broaden understanding of non-naskh reasoning.Originality/value - This study contributes to contemporary Qur'anic studies by demonstrating that the rejection of intra-Qur'anic naskh in Tafsir At-Tanwir is neither absolute nor methodologically uniform. It introduces the concept of methodological dualism to explain the tension between Muhammadiyah's purification-oriented interpretative ideals and its pragmatic engagement with classical Islamic jurisprudence, thereby enriching discussions on methodological consistency in modern Qur'anic interpretation.
Co-Authors Akhlis Al Majid Muchlishon, Ahmad Nailil Farohah Trisna Yudistira