Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Innovation Science and Knowledge
Safiulloh
Universitas Bina Bangsa
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR DENGAN ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PENARIKAN PAKSA OLEH (PIHAK KE III) DALAM PERIKATAN FIDUSIA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 63.Pdt.G.S/2025/PN Serang) Suhartoyo; Iron Fajrul Aslami; Safiulloh
Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v10i1.12305

Abstract

This research is motivated by the widespread practice of third parties (debt collectors) forcibly withdrawing fiduciary collateral objects without complying with legal procedures, thereby potentially harming debtors with good intentions and creating legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the validity of the execution of fiduciary collateral without a summons or court order, as well as the form of legal protection for debtors under Decision Number 63/Pdt.G.S/2025/PN Serang. The research uses a normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The results of the study indicate that the execution of fiduciary collateral without a summons, without a default agreement, without voluntary surrender of collateral objects by the debtor, and without a court mechanism is contrary to Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees and Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 in conjunction with Constitutional Court Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021. Forced withdrawal by a third party under these circumstances constitutes an unlawful act because it violates the debtor's rights and the principle of due process of law. Legal protection is provided through preventive mechanisms, including the regulation of legitimate execution procedures, and through repressive measures, including lawsuits to obtain rights restoration and compensation. Therefore, the enforcement of fiduciary guarantees must be carried out in accordance with the law to ensure legal certainty, justice, and protection for debtors acting in good faith
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Pasal Dalam Dakwaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berdasarkan Pasal 340 KUHP dan 338 KUHP (Studi Kasus Putusan 691/Pid.B/2025/PN Srg) Aisyah Nur Salsabila; ⁠Iron Fajrul Aslami; Safiulloh
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Science and Knowledge Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): IJISK 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Pendidikan Ilmu Keguruan, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/ijisk.v3i3.587

Abstract

Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Merupakan Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa Yang Dalam Penerapannya Dapat Menimbulkan Perbedaan Penilaian Mengenai Unsur Perencanaan Terlebih Dahulu Sebagaimana Diatur Dalam Pasal 338 Dan “Pasal 340 KUHP”. Hal Tersebut Terjadi Dalam Perkara “Nomor 691/Pid.B/2025/PN Srg”, Di Mana Jaksa Menerapkan “Pasal 338 KUHP”, Sedangkan Majelis Hakim Menerapkan “Pasal 340 KUHP”. Permasalahan Dalam Penelitian Ini Berfokus Pada Penerapan Ketentuan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Serta Pertimbangan Hukum Majelis Hakim Dalam Menentukan Terpenuhinya Unsur Perencanaan Terlebih Dahulu Pada Perkara “Nomor 691/Pid.B/2025/PN Srg”. Kajian Dilakukan Dengan Melihat Kesesuaian Antara Fakta Hukum Yang Terungkap Dalam Putusan Dengan Ketentuan Pasal 338 Dan “Pasal 340 KUHP” Serta Doktrin Hukum Pidana Yang Relevan. Penelitian Menggunakan Metode Yuridis Normatif Didukung Data Empiris, Dengan Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan Dan Konseptual. Bahan Hukum Primer Meliputi KUHP Dan Putusan “Nomor 691/Pid.B/2025/PN Srg”, Dilengkapi Studi Kepustakaan Dan Wawancara Narasumber, Lalu Dianalisis Kualitatif Dengan Membandingkan Fakta Hukum Putusan Terhadap Ketentuan Dan Doktrin Relevan. Dapat Disimpulkan Bahwa Unsur Pembunuhan Berencana Dalam “Pasal 340 KUHP” Terpenuhi Secara Sah Dan Meyakinkan, Sehingga Disparitas Antara Dakwaan Jaksa Dan Putusan Hakim Merupakan Konsekuensi Wajar Dari Independensi Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim, Bukan Kekeliruan Sistem Peradilan
Co-Authors Aisyah Nur Salsabila Iron Fajrul Aslami Suhartoyo ⁠Iron Fajrul Aslami