Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan An Nisa' Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation
A. Aswar
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Meritokrasi dan Netralitas ASN dalam Pilkada: Analisis Normatif Asia. A Parangrangi; A. Aswar; A. Hartawati; Zulviani Syam
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 1: AL-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i1.9452

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the neutrality of civil servants (ASN) within the framework of bureaucratic meritocracy in regional head elections (pilkada), with a particular focus on identifying structural and institutional factors that influence violations of neutrality. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials are classified into primary sources, including laws and regulations governing ASN neutrality, secondary sources such as books and scholarly articles, and tertiary sources including legal dictionaries. The analysis is conducted through qualitative and interpretative techniques to examine the consistency between legal norms and their implementation in practice. The findings reveal that the persistence of neutrality violations among civil servants is not primarily caused by the absence of legal regulation, but rather by weak implementation of the merit system, ineffective bureaucratic oversight, and inconsistent law enforcement. Supervision mechanisms tend to be reactive rather than preventive, while enforcement institutions face fragmentation of authority and lack of coordination. Furthermore, the legal culture within bureaucracy still tolerates political intervention, which undermines the principle of professionalism. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that ensuring ASN neutrality requires not only adequate regulatory frameworks but also institutional strengthening, integrated supervision systems, and consistent enforcement mechanisms. These findings contribute theoretically to the development of administrative law by emphasizing the importance of institutional capacity and legal culture and practically provide policy implications for improving bureaucratic governance and safeguarding democratic integrity in Indonesia.
KEBERLANJUTAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK TERPADU BERBASIS MASYARAKAT: PELEMBAGAAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK MELALUI PERATURAN DESA DI KABUPATEN BONE Asia A. Pananrangi; A. Aswar
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v12i1.10090

Abstract

Ensuring the sustainability of child protection initiatives at the village level remains a significant challenge due to weak institutionalisation and limited support from local governance structures. Although the Community-Based Integrated Child Protection programme (Perlindungan Anak Terpadu Berbasis Masyarakat or PATBM) was designed as a community-driven mechanism emphasizing prevention, public education, and early referral systems for cases of violence and exploitation against children, its implementation frequently depends on external assistance and project-based support. This article examines the institutionalisation of PATBM through Village Regulations as a legal strategy for strengthening sustainable child protection governance in villages in Bone Regency. This research conducted with socio-legal approach with a case study design, combining normative analysis of village governance and child protection regulations with empirical analysis of local institutional practices. The findings demonstrate that the adoption of four Village Regulations formally incorporating PATBM into the Village Community Institution structure has strengthened legal legitimacy, clarified institutional responsibilities, and integrated child protection into village governance mechanisms. While concerns regarding fiscal capacity emerged during the regulatory process, these challenges were addressed through activity-based budgeting arrangements that provide greater flexibility and financial accountability. The study concludes that Village Regulations constitute an effective legal governance instrument for ensuring the sustainability of community-based child protection initiatives.
LUKA WARISAN: IMPLIKASI BUDAYA PATRIARKI PADA KASUS KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA DI KABUPATEN BONE A. Aswar; Ahmad Nugraha Abrar; Rahmat Hidayat; Nani Suciati; Asria Wahyuni
AN-NISA Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The low status of women in a patriarchal culture renders them vulnerable to discrimination and violence within both the social and domestic spheres. The Bugis community maintains a wide range of cultural traditions, including a deeply rooted patriarchal paradigm. This imbalance of power relations significantly increases the likelihood of women experiencing violence, particularly domestic violence (KDRT). This article aims to analyze the implications of patriarchal culture in cases of domestic violence within the Bugis community residing in Bone Regency. The research employs an empirical legal method, examining law as written norms while also analyzing legal behavior within society. The findings reveal that the patriarchal culture of the Bugis community in Bone Regency has direct implications for domestic violence. Unequal power relations, restrictions on women’s participation in the social sphere, and the persistence of the siri’ concept, alongside conservative religious interpretations, sustain patriarchal behavior within Bugis society.
Main Hakim Sendiri atas Nama Kesusilaan: Tinjauan Hukum Pidana dan Hak Asasi Manusia terhadap Praktik Penggerebekan Warga di Rumah Sewa Andi Aswar; Asia Andi Pananrangi; Reza Alief Andi; Ahmad Nugraha Abrar
Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ekspose.v25i1.11324

Abstract

This study examines the practice of community raids against unmarried couples residing in boarding houses and rented housing, which are often justified in the name of enforcing moral norms. Although such practices are framed as efforts to maintain social order, they raise serious legal concerns when conducted without lawful authority and due process. This study aims to analyze the practice of community raids from the perspectives of criminal law and human rights and to assess whether such actions constitute taking or enforcing the law into one’s own hands, which in modern terms is commonly referred to as vigilantism. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches through the examination of relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and scholarly opinions related to criminal law and human rights. The findings indicate that community raids lack legal authority, may give rise to criminal liability, and violate fundamental human rights, particularly the right to privacy and protection from arbitrary actions. The study emphasizes the necessity of clear normative boundaries on community participation in enforcing morality to ensure consistency with the rule of law and human rights protection.   Fenomena penggerebekan oleh warga terhadap pasangan bukan suami istri di kost dan kontrakan kerap dibenarkan atas dasar penegakan norma kesusilaan. Praktik tersebut, meskipun berangkat dari nilai moral dan ketertiban sosial, menimbulkan persoalan hukum serius ketika dilakukan tanpa kewenangan dan prosedur hukum yang sah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis praktik penggerebekan warga dari perspektif hukum pidana dan hak asasi manusia serta menilai apakah tindakan tersebut dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai bentuk main hakim sendiri (eigenrichting). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggerebekan warga tidak memiliki dasar kewenangan hukum, berpotensi menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban pidana, serta melanggar hak asasi manusia, khususnya hak atas privasi dan perlindungan dari tindakan sewenang-wenang. Penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya pembatasan normatif terhadap peran warga dalam menjaga ketertiban dan norma kesusilaan agar tetap selaras dengan prinsip negara hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.
Empowering Female Legislators in the South Sulawesi Regional People's Representative Council Asia A.Paranrangi; Andi Hartawati; A. Aswar
International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): April: Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/h8ta0422

Abstract

This study examines the strengthening of female legislators in the Regional People's Representative Council of South Sulawesi through a mixed empirical–normative socio-legal approach. It integrates doctrinal analysis of statutory frameworks with qualitative field data derived from interviews, document analysis, and legislative records to construct a context-sensitive empowerment model. The findings reveal that despite formal guarantees of gender equality within Indonesian legal frameworks, female legislators continue to face structural, cultural, and institutional constraints that limit their substantive participation in legislative functions. Empirical evidence highlights gaps in institutional support, unequal access to strategic political positions, and the persistence of patriarchal norms influencing legislative dynamics. The study develops a multidimensional empowerment model consisting of legal reinforcement, institutional restructuring, and capacity enhancement, which is validated through triangulation and expert evaluation. This model demonstrates the importance of aligning legal mandates with institutional practices and individual competencies to achieve gender-responsive governance. The research contributes to socio-legal scholarship by offering an empirically grounded and normatively informed framework for strengthening women’s legislative roles in decentralized political systems.
Co-Authors A. Hartawati Ahmad Nugraha Abrar Ahmad Nugraha Abrar Andi Hartawati Asia A. Pananrangi Asria Wahyuni Nani Suciati Rahmat Hidayat Reza Alief Andi Zulviani Syam