Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Accountability for Food Poisoning Cases in the Free Nutrition Program in Islamic Law (Analysis of Diyat and Ta'zir) Muh Tabran
Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah
Publisher : Ma'had Aly Raudhatul Ma'arif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61842/swq/v4i1.59

Abstract

The concept of accountability in Islamic criminal law, Diyat and Ta'zir, in cases of food poisoning that can results in death and physical and sensory damage, provides a clear picture of the concept of punishment in Islam with the aim of protecting life and achieving the objectives of the free nutritious meal program (MBG). This study uses a qualitative approach with library research, which is descriptive in nature and normative in terms of Sharia law. Data collection used the Publish or Perish database on Google Scholar. Primary data consisted of articles indexed by Scopus and Sinta, as well as laws. Secondary data consisted of news reports. The data analysis method used was Miles Huberman and Saldana, reduction, display, and presentation. The results of the study show that the responsibility for accidental poisoning cases includes Diyat Mukhaffah, which is paid with 100 camels, and intentional poisoning is punished with Diyat Mughallazah, which is paid with 100 camels with aggravation if forgiven. Ta'zir for unintentional poisoning is punished with a fine and imprisonment under Law No. 18 of 2012 and Article 359 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Ta'zir for intentional poisoning is punished with the penalty for premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, or life imprisonment or 20 years' imprisonment. The conclusion of this study is that liability for cases of poisoning from free nutritious food, Diyat and Ta'zir offer solutions and lessons or deterrent effects on perpetrators, so that this program can run optimally by paying attention to food safety and ensuring the lives of the Indonesian people in order to achieve nutritional fulfillment.
Rekonseptualisasi Shura dalam Sistem Konstitusional Modern: Analisis Tafsir Tematik Muh Tabran; Rosmini; Hasyim Haddade
MISYKAT AL-ANWAR JURNAL KAJIAN ISLAM DAN MASYARAKAT Vol 9 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Islamic Studies, University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/ma.9.2.299-310

Abstract

The phenomenon of super-majority coalitions, coupled with strict factional discipline and the low scientific competence of some legislators, has altered the essence of deliberation. Consequently, there is a risk that the majority will make decisions that disregard public aspirations. This study aims to analyze the impact of suboptimal deliberation and decision-making, examine Qur’anic verses regarding sound decision-making practices, and propose improvements to foster healthy meeting ethics within the people’s representative body. The method used is a qualitative literature review that integrates thematic exegesis to analyze Qur’anic verses in order to assess the actual conditions in the Indonesian parliament. Verses such as Surah Al-Shura verse 38, Surah Al-Baqarah verse 233, and Surah Ali Imran verse 159 were collected and analyzed in depth to identify the fundamental criteria for ideal deliberation. The research results formulated four main criteria. First, the need for standard limits on scholarly competence. Second, the existence of equal rights for all meeting participants. Third, the freedom of expression for every council member to defend the interests of the people. Fourth, the achievement of consensus must be based on mutual consent. The study’s conclusions offer new insights for the development of Islamic Constitutional Law by establishing Qur’anic values as a fundamental guide in restructuring the country’s representative institutions